Local Government
Citing Tax Increase, 4-1 Supervisor Majority Selects Health Care Coverage Option Putting Increased Costs on Employees
As promised, Royal Examiner is following up on our lead story on the May 7th Warren County Board of Supervisors meeting on other actions and discussions. One topic added to the agenda at the meeting’s outset under “Additional New Business” was how the county government will absorb increases in its Employee Health Care coverage through United Health Care. Board Chairman Cheryl Cullers presented the agenda addition, which was approved unanimously.
And while the addition was made near the outset of the 7 p.m. meeting, the “Additional New Business” was the meeting’s final agenda item. So, it was two hours later (2:02:45 linked County video mark) when Assistant County Administrator Jane Meadows took the lead in presenting the options facing the supervisors to them. Meadows opened noting that for the coming Fiscal Year-2024/25 the County had received a 7.7% increased cost for Group Health, Dental, and Visual coverage, “along with a $40,000 premium holiday for the July bill.”
Meadows noted the board had been presented with two options in covering those increases. “Option A reflects the County absorbing the increase in the rates, and the employee contribution to the premium is remaining the same as premium year 2024.
“Option B reflects the portion of the increase being absorbed by the employees in the higher deductible $1,000-dollar plan and the preventive dental plan, and the County contributions being mirrored from the $1,000-dollar plan to the $250-dollar plan, as well for Comprehensive Dental,” Meadows said, noting that, “We are currently staying with the $1,000 and $250 deductible plans. And then the Comprehensive and Preventive Dental Plans are remaining the same. The Vision Plan did not change, the Vision Plan, the pricing for that was locked in for this year during our renewal previously.”
Meadows continued to point out that, “From the proposed FY-24/25 budget approximately $3.3 to .4 or .5 million dollars have been allocated for insurance premiums for our full-time employees. The estimated increase in the full costs for FY-25 versus FY-24 is $269,000. And that cost will vary depending on the number of participants in each plan.” Completing her summary, Meadows fielded board questions beginning at the 2:04:52 video mark.
Fork District Supervisor Vicky Cook began by verifying that the amount the County would absorb under Plan A was $69,000. Meadow confirmed that number. Cook then sighted the savings to the County from going with Plan B was about $45,000 of that $69,000 Option A cost to the county government to absorb its employees health care coverage cost hikes. Meadows again confirmed Cook’s reading of the material circulated to the board prior to the meeting.
The long story, made short is that a board majority found that $45,000 cost too high a price to place on county citizens as a whole in a year the board was raising taxes to cover its FY-2025 budget. That consensus was reached despite Meadows appearing to point out that the last several years of Cost of Living raises county employees received had not matched the inflation rate for across-the-board living expenses.
Asked by Vice-Chairman “Jay” Butler which option she recommended, Meadows replied, “Option A” further stating, “I feel that since we are still, with cost of living shifts, we are still below it. I feel personally, I was director of HR (Human Resources), I’m a little employee biased … I feel Option A would be greatly appreciated by our team. Option B of course, saves $45,000. Those are the options we are presenting to you, and that is the challenge for each of you,” Meadows observed.
Cook elicited an admission that over the past three years in the new health insurance carrier plan, the County had absorbed any increases because overall the coverage plan was saving the County money over other options.
There was extensive discussion and estimations of the number of employees affected by Option B (65 in high deductible group was cited) and their monthly and annual costs ranging in the neighborhood of $228 to $288 per year and $19 to $24 monthly. As the board approached a vote, North River Supervisor Richard Jamieson noted the pending tax increase to cover the Fiscal Year-2025 budget on the table (2:17:30 video mark). “Especially in a year where we’re raising taxes everybody takes a little bit on their shoulders,” Jamieson observed.
“I’m just not really comfortable with the idea of completely shielding — county employees are sort of like a different class from these realities. I’ll harken back to other people out in the economy that are struggling with, well, they’re going to get a tax increase, as are the employees. Who else is going to get their health insurance premiums going up?” Jamieson asked rhetorically.
He complemented Meadows on her background work; however, added that he thought it was “a relatively small slice” that employees were being asked to shoulder under Option B.
Finally the chairman sought a motion. Vice-Chairman Butler responded first, seeking approval of Option A with the County covering the increased health insurance costs. His motion died without a second. Cook then made the motion in support of Option B, which was seconded by Jamieson. That motion was approved by a 4-1 vote with only Butler dissenting. However, Chairman Cullers preceded her vote with a lengthy preface that it pained her to have to make the choice for the County not to absorb the Health Insurance increases, but with the financial variables before the board, including if we recall correctly its first tax increase in about 4 years, she would reluctantly support Option B. Before casting the final vote, John Stanmeyer also bemoaned the choice before the board, but also acquiesced to support of the $45,000 savings to the county budget that Option B would provide.
Other ‘New Business’
In other business the board approved the six public hearing requests following the opening one on the private school relocation to Rockland. Unlike that approval of the CUP for the John Paul the Great Montessori Academy to a portion of the former Bowling Green South Golf Course which had 14 speakers in support, all of the subsequent public hearings were approved without a dissenting vote and no public comment pro or con. Those final six public hearing topics will be listed at the end of this story.
A 12-item Consent Agenda was approved with two items removed for discussion. Those two items were a contract with TACS for the collection of delinquent county tax accounts, and the Awarding of contract with BFI Waste Services. Both were also approved after discussion.
Also under New Business, the Authorization to Advertise for Public Hearings of two items brought forward by planning and zoning staff were approved. Those items were:
- Authorization to Advertise for Public Hearing: Z2024-04-01 – Campground – Michaun Pierre – A request to amend Chapter 180 of the Warren County Code to amend §180-8C to add definitions for Camping Unit and Tent, to modify the existing definitions of Commercial Campground and Commercial Camping, and to repeal the existing definitions of Unit Space, Vacation Camp, Day, and Vacation Camp, Overnight, to amend §180-21D to modify the listed Commercial Campground use and to repeal the listed Vacation Camp, Day/Overnight use in the Agricultural District Regulations, to amend §180-27D to modify the listed Commercial Campground use in the Commercial District Regulations, to amend §180-41 to modify the existing supplementary regulations for Commercial Campgrounds, and to amend §180-57 to repeal the existing supplementary regulations for Vacation Camp, Day or Overnight. – Summarized by Chase Lenz, Zoning Administrator; and:
- Authorization to Advertise for Public Hearing: Z2024-04-02 – Zoning District Regulations – Warren County Planning Staff – A request to amend Chapter 180 of the Warren County Code to amend §180-21 to make Public Schools permissible only by Conditional Use Permit in the Agricultural (A) District, to amend §180-25 to make Store/Dwelling Combination and Library permissible only by Conditional Use Permit in the Village Residential (VR) District, to amend §180-26 to add Church as a use permissible only by Conditional Use Permit in the Suburban Residential (SR) District, and to amend §180-28 to add Church as a use permitted by right in the Industrial (I) District. – Chase Lenz, Zoning Administrator.
The county supervisors May 7 meeting began at 6:30 p.m. with a Closed Session, the motion into reading: “I move the Board enter into a closed meeting under the provisions of Sections 2.2-3711(A)(8) for consultation with legal counsel pertaining to the process for the providing of funds for Business development”.
Approved Public Hearing items I through N
- Public Hearing: CUP2024-03-01 Joel Didriksen – A request for a conditional use permit for a Short-Term Tourist Rental. The property is located at 3017 Blue Mountain Road and identified on tax map 16A, section 1, block 1, lot 21. The property is zoned Residential-One (R-1) and located in the Blue Mountain subdivision and in the Shenandoah Magisterial District.
- Public Hearing: CUP2024-03-02 Jennifer Wynn – A request for a conditional use permit for a ShortTerm Tourist Rental. The property is located at 703 Sunset Village Rd. and identified on tax map 27D, section 1, lot 9A. The property is zoned Residential-One (R-1) and located in the Junewood Estates subdivision and the Fork Magisterial District.
- Public Hearing: CUP2024-03-04 Jack Donohue – A request for a conditional use permit for a Contactor Storage Yard. The property is located at (0) Winners Ct. and identified on tax map 5, lot 11B. The property is zoned Industrial (I) and located in the Walker-Brugh subdivision and the North River Magisterial District.
- Public Hearing – Lease Agreement of Hangar B17 to Andrew Gass at $350 per month.
- Public Hearing – Lease Agreement of Hangar A14 to Otis Blake Bacon at $350 per month.
- Public Hearing – Lease Agreement of 179 Stokes Airport Rd. at $350 per month.
Click here to watch the May 7th Warren County Board of Supervisors Meeting.
Local Government
Agritourism a Key Focus at County Planning Commission’s Work Session
“It saves the land.” That is what Warren County Planning Commissioner Kaylee Richardson told the Royal Examiner on the evening of Wednesday, June 12, after a work session that began at 6 p.m. and lasted until 7 p.m. and after a regular meeting that began at 7 p.m. and lasted until 9 p.m. at the Warren County Government Center at 220 North Commerce Avenue. Richardson indicated the commission’s desire to honor and protect agriculture in Warren County. Supporting the growing trend of agritourism is one of the ways that goal can be accomplished.
In addition to serving as one of the county’s planning commissioners, Richardson is a farmer who uses her resources to practice an agritourism business. On the US Department of Agriculture’s website, agritourism is defined as “a form of commercial enterprise that links agricultural production and/or processing with tourism to attract visitors onto a farm, ranch, or other agricultural business to entertain or educate the visitors while generating income for the farm, ranch, or business owner.” Richardson educates her guests through classes that teach them, among other things, about how beehives can enrich the soil and thereby positively impact the environment. One of Richardson’s main attractions is beekeeping.
As a generation of farmers grows older and faces extinction, Richardson underlines the importance of providing opportunities for young people to have a hands-on experience with farming, fall in love with it, and possibly see it as a viable career path for their future. This is what she calls planting seeds. These young people may come from a city where they would never have the chance to learn about farming. Talking to Richardson is itself a learning experience. Her passion for beekeeping is palpable. Bees, she shared, will travel as much as two and a half miles away from their colony. “They’re very low impact,” she said, “but they bring so much to the community.” At any given time, she ranges from forty to fifty colonies. She rescues bees and supplies them to others interested in starting their own beekeeping concern. As for soil enrichment, bees add nitrogen back into the soil by pollinating white clover, which is a net positive for the environment.
As the county planning commission fine-tunes its comprehensive development plan, agritourism is a relevant concern. Although its inclusion in the plan is not required by law, the commission has it on its radar.
Click here to watch the Warren County Planning Commission Meeting of June 12, 2024.
Local Government
A Divided Community Debates the Past, Present and Future of County Public Schools Funding
Tuesday’s Fiscal Year-2025 Warren County Budget Public Hearing was another face off between pro-public school staff and supporters and anti-public schools funding proponents, the latter appearing tied to religious private or home-schooling and anti-tax hike proponents. However, it was not the massive numbers showdown that occurred just over a year ago between supporters and non-supporters of Samuels Public Library when a similar funding debate occurred.
Just 11 people spoke at the public hearing, with a slim 6-5 anti-increased public schools funding majority. One surprise was that the public schools funding debate occurred in front of a largely empty public gallery space. The arguments from both sides were familiar, with anti-additional funding for public schools proponents alleging a lack of administrative transparency on funding needs and proposed operational expenditures, and a general miss-use of the local funding it does receive.
Public schools staff, including teachers, and supporters countered that it was, in fact, teachers, support staff, and students who would be directly harmed by a proposed flat local funding by the county government. Some pointed to lagging student achievement standards cited by public schools critics at four of the divisions schools, as a result of a recent history of flat local funding as opposed to a missuse of available funds. Sarah Downs, a past and present vocal supporter of Warren County Public Schools, spoke to her perception of the county’s elected officials in this very regard.
An “Unacceptable Question”?
“Year after year you have the opportunity to invest in the children of our county and yet every year for four years the local funding has remained flat for Warren County Public Schools,” Downs pointedly told the supervisors, posing what she said seemed to be “an unacceptable question” from their perspective, their way: “Why have we not raised local funding to our schools in four years?” she asked of a time period that has been described as the most inflationary in America over the past 100 years.
“Absolutely, I agree with raising taxes and funding necessary services, but to not even offer a small increase in funding to account for inflation is unrealistic and unacceptable to me. I pay my taxes assuming at least some of the increase goes to the schools and yet nothing,” she said of what has been cited as the county’s largest single employer.
“In April I came to you explaining the decrease in federal funding and that decrease is large, $1.4 million dollars. This is something we estimated and yet you did not anticipate,” Downs told the supervisors. “Nothing about the future of our education system and the sustainability of the system really can be compared to a Christmas wish list … Adding a new reading specialist or a new agriculture teacher is not a Christmas list item,” Downs asserted with emphasis. “The expenses that will be cut this year will be expended eventually. The lack of funding for now will contribute to the accreditation issues, staffing shortages and more.
“A lack of investment now, is an expense with interest and inflation incurred in the future — and/or a continuation to fail to support children. And my advocacy for investing in the children of this county will not cease,” Downs assured the county’s elected officials in closing her comments with a “thank you” for the opportunity to make her case against the county budget as proposed regarding the community’s public educational system.
Counterpoint
As the public hearing’s opening speaker, John Lundberg spoke for the other side of the argument. Citing what he called “a year-long study of the cost of public education in Warren County” that he conducted in Fiscal Year-2022, Lundberg pointed to numbers he believes don’t add up to a quality educational system. He said he asked for a “single figure” for how much the public school system had allocated for in five categories for the then-coming FY-2022 budget. Those categories were: “402 teachers, 35 administrators, 298 district employees other than teachers and administrators, benefits, and non-labor costs,” Lundberg said, adding, “I was given the data I requested. Plus I was told I would be notified at the end of the Fiscal Year how much money was actually spent in these five categories. At the end of Fiscal Year-2022, I was given a detailed 48-page report.”
However, Lundberg’s perception of what he received was not favorable. “The total cost to taxpayers in FY-22, to educate 5,000 students in Warren County Public Schools — when you add mortgage payments of approximately $10 million to the District’s ‘Operating Fund expenditures’ — was $80,269,899 — an average of $16,200 per student per year,” he asserted. “That’s a mnd-boggling figure … far, far more than it cost a family to send any child to any private or parochial school in the county.”
Lundberg directed a series of critical comments at Public Schools Superintendent Dr. Chris Ballenger in his analysis of what he received regarding the FY-2022 public schools budget: “Members of the Board of Supervisors, I wish to state clearly in closing that Dr. Ballenger’s request for increased funding for next year is an outrage! Tell him to cut the cosr of public education in Warren County, not increase it. Don’t allow him to spend one penny more next year than he spent last year.”
We will reference one other speaker due to her position to ascertain budgetary impacts on teachers and support staff, and ultimately on that staff’s ability to educate the students of Warren County Public Schools.
A teacher’s perspective
“My name is Rebecca Hutson. I am co-president of the Warren County Education Association representing the teachers and staff of Warren County. I am also a resident of the Happy Creek District, an educator in Warren County Public Schools, and the parent of a Warren County Public Schools student,” Hutson said in introducing herself to the county supervisors.
“I am very concerned by the decision to provide no additional funds to Warren County Public Schools. We have heard you say that you want to support the educators of Warren County Public Schools. The best way to do that is to support the schools’ budget.
“Because of the decision to flat fund the schools, our school board has needed to cut another $2.4 million from their budget. Each building will have to function on the same amount of money as last year even though the cost of most things have gone up. Having to do this will not help or support our teachers,” Hutson asserted, noting the consequences of proposed cuts do not end there.
“Even with those measures, the school board needs to cut another $981,112. To do this they will need to eliminate three new positions. Those positions would have provided an additional agriculture teacher for our students; a reading specialist who would have helped our teachers implement the new literacy act that goes into effect next school year; and an additional elementary teacher that would have reduced class sizes and made for better teaching and learning conditions. Losing those positions is not in the best interest of the teachers or students at Warren County Public Schools. — Maybe Hutson can get together with above-cited Sarah Downs to put together a “Christmas Wish List” of needed staff. — Maybe Santa will listen if the supervisors don’t.
If the operational situation she was describing wasn’t bleak enough, Hutson further noted that, “Even after those positions have been cut, there is still a need to cut the budget by another $720,569. There is nowhere left to cut except for the salaries and benefits of the teachers and staff of Warren County Public Schools,” she pointed out, ending her sentence with the now-familiar refrain: “This is not in the best interest of the Warren County Public Schools teachers or staff … In fact, some teachers may actually make less money next year if these cuts take place … I implore you to reconsider your decision to flat fund the Warren County Public Schools budget … The current decision to flat fund our budget is harmful to the teachers, staff, and students of Warren County.”
The board has until its meeting of Tuesday, June 25, when a FY-25 budget vote is scheduled, to consider what it has heard regarding its coming fiscal year budget, particularly as it relates to funding of the Warren County Public Schools system.
See the linked County video for the full FY-2025 Budget Public Hearing debate of the 11 speakers granted three minutes each to make their respective cases. Following County Administrator Ed Daley’s PowerPoint budget summary begun at the 1:35 video mark, Board Chair Cheryl Cullers convenes the public hearing at the 18:50 mark of the linked 51:54 video.
Click here to watch the June 11, 2024, Warren County Board of Supervisors Meeting.
Local Government
Staff Identifies for Town Council the Need to Fill Two Vacancies on Local Board of Building Code Appeals
The town of Front Royal has vacancies to fill. In a presentation before the Front Royal Town Council on Monday, June 10, at a work session that began at 7 p.m. in the Front Royal Town Hall on 102 East Main Street, Planning Director and Zoning Administrator Lauren Kopishke shed light on the Local Board of Building Code Appeals (LBBCA) which currently has two vacancies and is therefore inoperative, at the expense of processes that must continue in the Town’s daily business.
Established in January 2023, the LBBCA provides a means by which an aggrieved party can appeal the determination of the Property Maintenance Official through an application with a $400 fee. As Mayor Lori Cockrell pointed out during the council’s discussion with Kopishke, the $400 fee is a deterrent since many citation recipients will likely find it easier to comply with the regulations than go through the costly appeals process. However, as Kopishke pointed out, even that $400 fee does not cover the cost of the meeting appointed to address that appeal. At any rate, in the interim, until those two vacancies are filled, Kopishke’s department can still issue zoning citations. Still, it cannot issue property maintenance citations as each has different codes.
Thus, there are these two vacancies for which the Town accepts applications and two positions for alternates if there is an absence. Cockrell admitted that she thought there would be more of a response. However, on June 22 from noon to 3 p.m. near the Gazebo on Main Street, where the Town is holding an open house, there will be an opportunity for any interested parties to approach the planning and zoning table and learn more about these LBBCA positions. All members must live in Warren County, and three must live in the town. To quote the Town code, “At least three members shall have no less than five years’ knowledge and experience in the construction industry. Members that do not have knowledge and experience in the construction industry shall have an equivalent experience in the real estate, law, architecture, or engineering professions.” The code says that no employee or official of the Town may serve as a board member.
In an extreme case, in which the vacancies have not been filled, the town manager could arrange with another locality for an appeal to be heard. Given the overall sense at the meeting on Monday evening that this issue is being expedited, that extreme scenario likely will not occur.
Local Government
Final Opportunity for Public Comment on County’s FY-2025 County Budget Slated for June 11
On Thursday, June 6, the Warren County Board of Supervisors announced the legally advertised Special Meeting date for the public hearing on what has been at times a controversial publicly debated Fiscal Year-2025 Budget: “Notice is hereby given that the Chair has called a Special Meeting of the Warren County Board of Supervisors to be held beginning at 7:00 PM on Tuesday, June 11, 2024, in the Board Meeting Room of the Warren County Government Center, 220 North Commerce Avenue, Front Royal, Virginia. The meeting is called to hold a Public Hearing for the FY 2024-2025 Warren County Budget.”
That Special Meeting agenda also notes: “The Board will hear public comment on the proposed County budget, the proposed school operating and food services budget, and the proposed budgets for the Blue Mountain, Cedarville Heights, High Knob, Lake Front Royal, Linden Heights, Osprey Lane, Riverside, Shangri-La, Shannon Woods, Shenandoah Farms, Shenandoah Shores, Skyland Estates, South River Estates, and Wildcat Drive Sanitary Districts for FY 2024-2025.
“Citizens are invited and encouraged to submit comments on the proposed budget to zhenderson@warrencountyva.gov or by emailing or mailing their comments directly to their Supervisor,” the June 11 agenda observes, or of course you could show up to speak during Tuesday’s public hearing.
And while the county supervisors will listen on June 11, and possibly discuss what they have heard or read, they will not vote that evening. The board’s vote on final approval of its FY-2025 budget is slated for its June 25 meeting, six days prior to the July 1 start of Fiscal Year-2025.
As far as controversy surrounding the Fiscal Year-2025 Warren County Budget, it has revolved around two primary points. First, the need for a tax increase to provide sufficient revenue for the proposed budget, and second, the submitted Warren County Public Schools budget request.
Of the first factor, it should be pointed out that it would be the first tax increase tied to a County budget in, if we recall correctly, five years. It is a period during which the nation has been said to be in its most inflationary period in 100 years on service, infrastructure, and other open market operational costs.
On the county public schools side, controversy has swirled around the movement of surplus funds from previous fiscal years between budget categories, as well as assertions of insufficient information on the driving reasons for specific funding requests. One might note that public school budget summaries submitted previously have included as much as 43 pages of small print, line-item budget requests, with additional information usually eventually available from School Admin staff.
As for the cross-category public schools surplus funds movement we reference discussion of that matter in the story “Special County Finance-Audit Committee meeting appears to clear the air on Public Schools surplus funds movement“
Local Government
Town Planning Commission Debriefed on Possible Development at Ashton Green
After executing a brief presentation of an application for a special use permit for a short-term rental at 415 East Main Street, Deputy Zoning Administrator John Ware guided the Front Royal Planning Commission through a detailed, intense overview of a possible development at Ashton Green that lasted for roughly an hour at the commission’s work session on Wednesday, June 5, beginning at 6 p.m. in the Front Royal Town Hall at 102 East Main Street.
Located near Happy Creek Road’s connection to Leach Run Parkway, Ashton Green is a wooded area with forty-three acres and borders already developed residential zones. Rappahannock HC, LLC owns 1321 Happy Creek Road, and the property is currently zoned Suburban Residential District (R-S). If the commission votes in favor at their June 26 meeting, this property will be rezoned to Residential District (R-1). This potential rezoning is significant because it would allow the developer to build forty-three additional dwelling units that would be permitted if the property remained under R-S zoning. Under R-S, Rappahannock could develop sixty-one dwelling units by right, while under R-1, the number would increase to one hundred four by right.
The evening’s agenda packet reflected a significant amount of labor on the part of the Planning and Zoning Department. A letter was addressed to Planning Director and Zoning Administrator Lauren Kopishke from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) informing her that, in their estimation, “this subdivision will have minimal impacts to the local roadway network.” As Ware explained to the commission, Rappahannock is prepared to give the Town the right-of-way it needs to make needed improvements to the Happy Creek Road segment adjacent to Ashton Green. Currently, that area features an S-bend that is less than ideal, and a realignment is desired. The proffers that Rappahannock is making would in part offset the cost of roadway improvements and offset the cost of a rise in the number of young people attending local schools. A fiscal impact analysis conducted by S. Patz and Associates concluded that the development of Ashton Green into an R-1 zone with one hundred four single-family detached dwelling units would generate an annual tax revenue of $407,620.
In compliance with the requirement of the state of Virginia that localities facilitate Urban Development Areas (UDA), the Town’s comprehensive plan calls for higher-density development, and Ashton Green, where Rappahannock wishes to achieve higher density, qualifies as one such UDA. Instead of pushing development out into the outer reaches of Town limits where there are likely to be agricultural zones that do not wish to be encroached upon, developing by right at a higher density within areas like Ashton Green has the potential to fulfill Front Royal’s need for housing for those working in the Town.
Local Government
Special County Finance-Audit Committee Meeting Appears to Clear the Air on Public Schools Surplus Funds Movement
The Finance and Audit Committee of Warren County held a Special Meeting at 6 p.m., Monday, June 3, in the Warren County Government Center Conference Room. Chair Vicky Cook indicated the purpose of the meeting was to iron out County Public Schools budget transfers between Fiscal Year-2023, FY-2024, as well as anticipated ones needing approval into FY-2025. Cook expressed concern on how some surplus funds had been or would be transferred between public schools budget categories, primarily between Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) and Operations. Public Schools Finance Director Rob Ballentine was an invited attendee and responded to committee questions, explaining the budgetary dynamics as best he could.
At the meeting’s conclusion there seemed to be a consensus that a variety of factors at all funding levels, Federal, State, and Local, some related to money originally earmarked to the schools through FY-2023 as part of the newly established CARES Act funding related to the federal COVID response, and special conditions there or elsewhere were involved in the confusion. One factor cited at the federal level was that some appropriated money wouldn’t be available until it had been spent. Another impetus on the Public Schools Administrative side was that surplus funds were transferred into categories that needed additional funding to prevent the County Board of Supervisors from having to borrow or empty interest-bearing accounts to provide that funding that existing surpluses could accommodate as a cost-saving alternative.
While expressing her ongoing concern that what had and was going to be done wasn’t traditional bookeeping 101, acknowledging the variety of confusing variables, Chairman Cook said, “I’m just saying that money should have gone to Fund One (Operations) … But understanding that it’s a little different, we learn from this and we move on.”
“My understanding is just it’s still evolving in terms of what its program as CARES Act funding and how it tracks. I can see where it would be challenging initially to propose how you’re going to use it,” appointed citizen committee member Kathlene Johnson observed, adding, “And to shift it from a federal direction into ours and how it will fit into the State budget. CARES Act funding is probably going to be haunting everybody for a long time,” Johnson concluded drawing some appreciative laughter.
When Committee Chair Cook was preparing to close the meeting after over 50 minutes of discussion she commented, “I hope number one, this was not a waste of time in calling this meeting.” Vice-Chairman Butler appeared to speak for the committee, as no one contradicted him after he replied, “No, I think this was very fruitful because it helps us to understand that it was just a timing difference. And you had a learning curve with the federal funds. And when the bills came in, how do they say, ‘There’s too much money left at the end …’ And so we had to move some of those around with the understanding that we’re going to get those funds in at some point where you’re going to reimburse (categories).”
And the fact that the meeting ended with a fair amount of laughter around the WCGC Conference Room appeared to be a good sign that any lingering suspicions of wrong doing or unethical movement of funds by county public schools administrative officials had evaporated for those present.
In addition to Cook and Butler from the county supervisors, county staff present for the Finance and Audit Committee Special Meeting included Finance Director Alisa Scott, Treasurer Janice Shanks, and Budget Analyst Megan Cheshire. Citizen appointees included the above-mentioned Kathleen Johnson, as well as James Bergida and Leslie Matthews. John Montoro was identified as special VML-VACO finance consultant. And as noted, public schools Finance Director Rob Ballentine was an invited and key attendee.