Transparency, Accountability, and Public Trust in Warren County

Transparency, openness, accountability, and community engagement are terms frequently used by public officials. These words are intended to assure the public that information is accessible and that transparency is a priority — yet they are often the same words employed by tyrannical governments to convince citizens of their honesty and integrity.

At the Warren County Board of Supervisors work session held Tuesday, April 22, 2025, the agenda listed eight items for discussion. The first seven items (A through G) were presented by department representatives, covering future requests, upcoming needs, and proposals for combining departments to improve operational efficiency.

Item H, however, was a presentation by Richard Jameson promoting the creation of a Warren County Economic Development initiative. Dr. Jameson, a sitting member of the Board of Supervisors, left his seat on the stage and approached the podium to address the board.

This raises an important question: what is the proper protocol when an elected official steps away from the board to make a presentation? Was Dr. Jameson speaking as a Supervisor or as a private citizen?
Additionally, was this presentation shared with other Board members prior to the meeting? Or was this an attempt to introduce a significant initiative without allowing for public discussion or input?

It’s worth noting that public speaking is not permitted during Warren County Board of Supervisors work sessions. Public comment is only allowed on agenda items during regular Board meetings, typically at the end of the session when most of the audience has already departed. Why does this Board seem unwilling to consistently follow its own established rules, standards of conduct, and protocols for public meetings? Perhaps the rules no longer apply — at least, not to everyone.

Now, a self-appointed “wizard” proposes to magically restore economic development, promising enhancements to the “shadow” tourist industry with plans for an ice-skating rink, a majestic multi-sports facility, and an upscale conference center — all at taxpayer expense. “Build it, and they will come” seems to be the guiding philosophy, yet there is little concrete information about efforts to attract businesses that would provide jobs and grow the county’s tax base.

Is this the same individual who has also taken on the role of morality protector and critic of Samuel’s Public Library, contributing significantly to community division?

Much attention has been directed toward the controversies surrounding Samuel’s Library. Now, economic development has become the new topic of focus. One must wonder: while energy is spent on these high-profile debates, could there be other undisclosed plans quietly moving forward?

John Jenkins
Warren County, VA
South River District

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the letters published on this page are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the Royal Examiner’s editorial team, its affiliates, or advertisers. The Royal Examiner does not endorse or take responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or validity of any statements made by the authors. The Royal Examiner has not independently verified the statements and claims presented in the letters. Readers are encouraged to exercise their own judgment and critical thinking skills when evaluating the content. Any reliance on the information in the letters is at the reader’s own risk.

While the Royal Examiner makes every effort to publish diverse opinions, it does not guarantee the publication of all received letters. The Royal Examiner reserves the right to edit letters for clarity, length, and adherence to editorial guidelines. Moreover, the Royal Examiner does not assume any liability for any loss or damage incurred by readers due to the content of the letters or any subsequent actions based on these opinions.

In submitting a letter to the editor, authors grant the newspaper the right to publish, edit, reproduce, or distribute the content in print, online, or in any other form.

We value the engagement of our readers and encourage open and constructive discussions on various topics. However, the Royal Examiner retains the right to reject any letter that contains offensive language, personal attacks, or violates any legal regulations. Thank you for being a part of our vibrant community of readers and contributors, and we look forward to receiving your diverse perspectives on matters of interest and importance.