Opinion
Are You Kidding Me? People Got Upset Because of a Character in a Parade?
And like all good stories passed down through generations, this one has been stretched, remixed, rebranded, and slapped with a bow. And this, too, shall pass.
Let’s begin with European folklore: Nicholas of Myra, also known as Nicholas of Bari, from what is now modern-day Turkey. He was a fourth-century bishop famous for helping the poor and giving gifts in secret, which is impressive even considering surveillance technology was terrible back then. After his death on December 6, he was canonized, because apparently, doing good things quietly was still enough to get you sainthood.
St. Nicholas was said to show people how to find Jesus among the poor, oppressed, and abused. Charity, but with justice. Faith, but with receipts. Basically, Nicholas was the original “do the right thing even when nobody’s watching” guy. (We need more of those.)
Fast forward a bit, take a left turn through the Netherlands, and his name gets transformed into Sinter Klaas, which eventually morphs into Santa Claus – a magical linguistic glow-up that somehow ends with a man in a red suit breaking into houses.
Now… for something not completely different.
Enter Krampus.
Krampus is usually described as a towering, fur-covered nightmare with horns, hooves, chains, bells, a sack, and a bundle of birch twigs – because apparently subtlety was never the goal. He originated in pagan winter solstice rituals in the Alpine regions of Europe, particularly Austria, where winters are long, dark, and apparently require at least one demon to keep people in line.
The winter solstice marks the longest night of the year, which explains why early communities invented creatures to scare away evil spirits – or possibly to scare their neighbors into behaving.
Now here’s where it gets spicy.
Our modern Western Christmas is basically a heavily rebranded pagan solstice party. There’s no record of December 25 being Jesus’s birthday in the Bible. The date doesn’t show up until the fourth century, when early Christians looked at existing solstice celebrations and said, “What if we… but make it Christian?”
The logic was simple: if Christianity showed up already decorated, people would be more likely to join. Pagan holidays honoring sun gods and Saturn? Rebranded. Same tree, different vibes.
Despite the Church’s repeated attempts to cancel him, Krampus refused to be uninvited. Instead, he got paired with St. Nicholas. On the night of December 5 – Krampusnacht – both figures arrive together. St. Nicholas rewards good kids with gifts. Krampus handles… performance reviews.
On December 6, St. Nicholas Day, children wake up to find either presents or a strong incentive to reflect on their life choices.
Yin and yang.
Light and dark.
Carrot and stick.
Santa and his emotionally unregulated coworker.
Because here’s the thing: once you trace the layers, Christmas stops being a single story and becomes a stack of stories stitched together by culture, power, fear, and hope. None of these figures exists alone; they’re mirrors of what people needed at the time.
St. Nicholas represents aspirational morality: generosity, compassion, justice – the “be the person you’d want to be proud of” model.
Krampus? Krampus is regulatory. He exists in communities where winter survival depended on cooperation, rules, and everyone not being a menace. When kindness failed, fear picked up the slack.
St. Nicholas without Krampus is idealism with no consequences.
Krampus without St. Nicholas is just a horror movie.
Together, they form a complete moral system: reward and restraint. Winter solstice traditions weren’t about pretending darkness didn’t exist – they were about surviving it. Christianity didn’t erase those traditions; it absorbed them, rebranded them, and added a nativity scene.
So maybe Krampus isn’t evil.
Maybe he’s just the cultural acknowledgment that humans don’t always do the right thing because it’s right – and sometimes the threat of a horned demon with a stick is what gets the job done.
So some folks are upset about Krampus in a parade? Are you kidding me?
Apparently not.
Sue Laurence
Front Royal, VA 22630
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the letters published on this page are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the Royal Examiner’s editorial team, its affiliates, or advertisers. The Royal Examiner does not endorse or take responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or validity of any statements made by the authors. The Royal Examiner has not independently verified the statements and claims presented in the letters. Readers are encouraged to exercise their own judgment and critical thinking skills when evaluating the content. Any reliance on the information in the letters is at the reader’s own risk.
While the Royal Examiner makes every effort to publish diverse opinions, it does not guarantee the publication of all received letters. The Royal Examiner reserves the right to edit letters for clarity, length, and adherence to editorial guidelines. Moreover, the Royal Examiner does not assume any liability for any loss or damage incurred by readers due to the content of the letters or any subsequent actions based on these opinions.
In submitting a letter to the editor, authors grant the newspaper the right to publish, edit, reproduce, or distribute the content in print, online, or in any other form.
We value the engagement of our readers and encourage open and constructive discussions on various topics. However, the Royal Examiner retains the right to reject any letter that contains offensive language, personal attacks, or violates any legal regulations. Thank you for being a part of our vibrant community of readers and contributors, and we look forward to receiving your diverse perspectives on matters of interest and importance.
