Parental Rights at Center of Reproductive Health Debate

Republicans are ramping up opposition to Democrat-led efforts to protect abortion and contraception access, claiming the proposals undermine parental rights in minors’ healthcare decisions. As these measures advance in the legislature, the battle over oversight is heating up.

The legislation “obliterates parental rights” that would “supersede any state law we have,” said Del. Mark Earley, R-Chesterfield, during Tuesday’s House floor debate.

House Majority Leader Charniele Herring, D-Alexandria, who is sponsoring the resolution, dismissed the claims.

“The law is the law until the court says it’s not,” Herring said, emphasizing that current state laws governing parental consent remain intact.

Virginia law requires minors to obtain parental or guardian consent for an abortion unless they petition a judge for authorization. This judicial bypass system is already in place and would not be affected by the amendment.

University of Richmond legal professor Meredith Harbach explained that amending Virginia’s Constitution would not override these existing legal safeguards, underscoring that the resolution does not specifically address minors or alter parental consent laws.

Harbach noted that numerous state and federal Supreme Court cases have upheld parental authority over minors in various situations.

While minors aren’t explicitly mentioned in the reproductive health bills facing Republican opposition, Democratic lawmakers argue that parental rights are already clearly defined in existing state law, making additional references unnecessary.

“We do not restate current law in every single bill that we bring forward, we allow existing code to speak for itself,” Del. Cia Price, D-Newport News, said during a Thursday morning committee meeting, addressing similar concerns raised about her right-to-contraception bill.

At the meeting, Jeff Caruso, director of the Virginia Catholic Conference, claimed Price’s bill would allow minors access to contraception without parental oversight. However, under current Virginia law, minors already have the legal right to consent to contraception without needing approval from parents or guardians.

Unlike abortions, which require parental, guardian or court consent, minors are legally treated as adults when it comes to consenting to contraception. Price’s legislation seeks to fortify protections for health care providers prescribing contraceptives and for patients seeking them.

Price stressed the urgency of these protections amid the evolving national landscape on reproductive healthcare. She highlighted how some states have moved to limit contraception access. Federal protection efforts similar to Price’s have failed.

She also highlighted that contraception serves purposes beyond preventing pregnancy, emphasizing its use in treating conditions such as endometriosis and polycystic ovarian syndrome. Sharing her personal experience with the latter, Price noted that she takes such medication for her treatment.

Price’s contraception bill, which cleared the legislature with bipartisan support last year, was vetoed by Gov. Glenn Youngkin. On Thursday, it once again cleared the Health and Human Services Committee with bipartisan support.

Unlike Price’s legislation, Herring’s constitutional amendment to protect abortion access does not require the governor’s approval. However, the measure must pass the legislature this year and again next year before it can appear on the ballot for voters to decide in November 2026.

Herring’s proposal passed the House of Delegates on Tuesday, and a similar measure sponsored by Jennifer Boysko, D-Fairfax, is set to be considered in the Senate soon.

Amending Virginia’s Constitution involves a more rigorous and lengthy process than passing legislation, but it also ensures greater permanence, less vulnerable to shifting partisan majorities in the legislature.

If approved by voters, the amendment would make Virginia party of a growing list of states —  both Republican and Democratic leaning — that have enshrined abortion protections in their Constitutions in recent years.

by Charlotte Rene Woods, Virginia Mercury

Virginia Mercury is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Virginia Mercury maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Samantha Willis for questions: info@virginiamercury.com.