Three Interesting Bills: Declawing Cats, Sewage Regulations and On-Duty Physicians

Hundreds of bills are filed for General Assembly consideration each year. In this weekly series, the Mercury takes a look at a few of lawmakers’ 2024 proposals that might not otherwise make headlines during the whirlwind legislative session.

A view of the Virginia House of Delegates Chamber in Richmond. (Nathaniel Cline/Virginia Mercury)

House Bill 1354: Prohibiting declawing cats

This bill from Del. Marty Martinez, D-Loudoun, would prohibit veterinarians from declawing cats unless necessary for therapeutic purposes.

In January, Martinez told the House Agriculture Subcommittee that his bill would let the state Board of Veterinarians strip those vets who perform the procedure of their license if they determine it’s warranted.

Daphna Nachminovitch with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals said declawing goes beyond the removal of the nail to actually amputate the first digit of every paw. As a result, she said it can cause behavioral issues and leave cats defenseless if they manage to escape outside.

“When I worked at an animal shelter, a lot of the cats declawed were brought to us as biters because they felt very defensive not being able to use their claws,” she said.

Susan Seward with the Virginia Veterinary Medical Association also noted an increasing number of veterinarians who no longer perform the procedure unless there has been an injury to the animal.

Exemptions to the prohibition, said Martinez, could be made if the cat has a condition that requires the removal of claws. Cats could also be declawed in cases where the owner has a condition such as hemophilia or HIV, and a physician recommends the procedure.

However, Del. Buddy Fowler, R-Hanover, said the bill is problematic for people who want to declaw their cats to stop them from scratching.

“I’m concerned about a lot of people who may no longer want to have cats as pets if they cannot do that,” he said.

Martinez said he and his wife made the “biggest mistake” when they decided to declaw their first cat, who was “never the same” after the procedure.

“I felt I could never do that again to any animal,” he continued. “I’m an animal lover, and anything we can do to prevent any kind of cruelty to animals is something I support.”

The bill passed both chambers, with a handful of Republicans joining Democrats in support. Gov. Glenn Youngkin is now reviewing it.

House Bill 870: Creating sewage sludge regulations

HB 870 from Del. David Bulova, D-Fairfax, would require the Virginia State Water Control Board to adopt regulations to address situations when wastewater treatment plant storage capacity is exceeded due to adverse weather conditions, resulting in the flow of biosolids — or sewage sludge — into state waters.

Bulova told the House last month that these sewage overflow events are expected to occur more frequently because of the increased frequency, intensity, and duration of storm events driven by climate change.

“I think we all agree that this bill deals with a smelly subject,” he said.

Representing the Virginia Biosolids Council, Kyle Shreve said biosolids, a byproduct of sewage treated at wastewater plants, are often used as fertilizer on farm fields. However, he said biosolids can’t be used during periods of heavy rainfall. They can begin to build up in storage facilities and potentially create water quality issues if they get in state waters.

The issue started gaining attention in 2018, when Virginia had its highest level of precipitation since 1895, according to data from the National Centers for Environmental Information. A series of intense storms hit the commonwealth the following year, flooding neighborhoods and overwhelming infrastructure.

During that period, Shreve said there were multiple storage challenges that the wastewater facilities could not deal with under current regulations, which offer different temporary solutions depending on the facility.

Shreve said the bill asks the Department of Environmental Quality to update the existing biosolids regulations so plans can be preapproved in the event severe weather prevents land application of biosolids in the future.

“It’s more of a timing thing to make sure we get ahead of it,” he said.

The legislation passed the House and Senate unanimously.

Senate Bill 392 and House Bill 353: Requiring emergency departments to have at least one physician on duty

This pair of identical bills from Del. Patrick Hope, D-Arlington, and Sen. Stella Pekarsky, D-Fairfax, would require hospitals to have at least one physician on duty and always physically present. Current law requires hospitals to have physicians on call and not necessarily physically present on the premises at all times.

Pekarsky told the House Health and Human Services Committee last month that Virginia’s code is outdated and the bills are intended to reflect current standards and best practices, as well as “matching our citizens’ expectations.”

An emergency room physician working at Southside Medical Center and Southern Virginia Medical Center told lawmakers that when the law requiring an emergency room physician to be on call passed, the volume and complexity of patients were a fraction of what they are now.

Emergency rooms “are now de facto intensive care units, boarding patients for hours or even days waiting for a bed at a receiving facility,” she told the committee.

While choking back tears, Del. Wren Williams, R-Patrick, told the House it needs to consider the unintended consequences of the bills on rural health care and hospitals. He said his district’s only hospital shut down in 2017, and the area only has one practicing physician in his late 60s. While Williams said he’s still working to reopen the hospital, he contended requiring an additional doctor on staff would make it harder.

“I really need you guys to think about unintended consequences when it comes to rural health care because this might save lives in other regions, but it’s going to hurt, and it’s going to have a real impact on places like mine,” he said.

The bills passed the Senate unanimously and faced Republican opposition in the House.

This story has been corrected to clarify what HB870 would do and reflect that Williams is a delegate, not a senator.

Virginia Mercury is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Virginia Mercury maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sarah Vogelsong for questions: info@virginiamercury.com. Follow Virginia Mercury on Facebook and Twitter.