Connect with us

Local Government

Council divide over legal boundaries surrounding COVID vaccination mandates widens

Published

on

The widening philosophical and procedural rift on the Front Royal Town Council surrounding COVID-19 pandemic vaccination issues was a recurring and meeting-opening theme on Monday, August 23. After first-term Councilman Scott Lloyd asked Mayor Chris Holloway for the floor to open the meeting, the first 35 minutes of the 2-hour-47-minute open meeting was taken up debating inclusion of Lloyd’s revised “emergency ordinance” targeting private-sector businesses within the town limits from issuing any vaccination mandates to employees.

Perhaps oddly, it was Lloyd explaining why he wanted his emergency ordinance, particularly targeting medical provider and Warren Memorial Hospital operator Valley Health, withdrawn from consideration that night. With the emergency of potential termination facing Valley Health employees as a September 7 deadline to have received at least a first dose Coronavirus vaccination – one of which, Pfizer, now has full FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approval – Lloyd finds himself facing his own emergency, he explained. That emergency is a potential conflict of interest Lloyd faces in bringing such legislation forward as a councilman while legally representing some Valley Health nurses who do not wish to be vaccinated against the worldwide viral pandemic that is attributed with claiming over 4.4 million lives worldwide, 637,000 in the U.S., over 11,600 in Virginia, and 64 in Warren County over the past year and a half.

‘Houston, we may have a problem’ Scott Lloyd may have been thinking as he explains the reason he asked for his re-tooled ‘emergency ordinance’ against private-sector COVID vaccine mandates be removed from the agenda. Royal Examiner Photos by Roger Bianchini

And while policy attorney Lloyd called his involvement with those nurses “private advocacy” thus far without compensation, it was noted by his colleague Letasha Thompson that those nurses described him as their attorney in a media report. When Lloyd stated that he had not spoken to that media outlet (NVD) about his role with the nurses, Thompson countered that the reporter had reached out to Lloyd, but that he had declined comment for the story.


Noting her July 12 work session questioning of his motive to bring his initial anti-vaccination-mandate emergency ordinance forward to a July 26 meeting vote after it had been ruled not legally supportable by the town attorney in a Dillon Rule state like Virginia, and a majority consensus against his proposal had been reached at work session, Thompson revisited her “motive” question: “I asked what was your end game – was it to win a lawsuit?” Thompson queried with the updated information.

Lloyd, as later some of his supporters present Monday evening would took offense at this line of questioning. “Informed consent (for an emergency medical situation) is being abused, and that’s only the start,” Lloyd asserted of COVID-19 vaccination mandates, “I find it odd that my motives are being questioned,” he added to scattered applause.

Lloyd, left, and Thompson, near right, began publicly butting heads over what legal staff deemed an unsupportable legislative prohibition on private sector COVID-19 vaccination mandates at this July 12 work session. Monday, Lloyd took offense, as did some of his anti-vax supporters, when his motives in continuing to revisit his anti-vax-mandate emergency ordinance proposal were again questioned.

After Lloyd reasserted that he had found legal precedent to contradict the town attorney’s opinion on the legality of his emergency ordinance proposals, first Vice-Mayor Lori Cockrell and then Councilman Gary Gillespie commended Doug Napier’s lengthy tenure, cited at about 40 years as a municipal attorney with first the county, then the town, and his performance at the head of the town legal department. It wouldn’t be the last reference to Napier’s legal background during the evening, as Lloyd supporters cast “conflict of interest” aspersions his way. In fact, the final agenda item on the Closed Session council adjourned to shortly before 10 p.m. was discussion of the town attorney’s performance, including the potential of “demotion, disciplining … and/or resignation”.

Earlier during the open meeting, some tension arose over social media posts Councilman Joseph McFadden has made targeting his colleagues or staff. At one point Mayor Holloway felt compelled to point out that when allegations against someone, with potential factual inaccuracies involved, are publicly made, lawsuits could be the result.

Scott Lloyd, left, and Town Attorney Doug Napier, far right side of table, have a legal stare down during July 12 work session discussion of legal issues with Lloyd’s initial anti-vax-mandate proposal.

But back at the meeting’s first half-hour plus, the majority that has sided with the Town legal staff’s opinion that Lloyd’s anti-private-sector vaccination mandates are not legally supportable, argued to keep it on the agenda to put it behind them once and for all. And at 7:35 p.m., Lloyd’s motion seconded by his one council ally, McFadden, to remove the new anti-vaccine mandate emergency ordinance from the agenda failed by the familiar 3-2 majority of Cockrell-Thompson-Gillespie voting no.

So, it seemed somewhat anti-climactic an hour-and-15-minutes later at 8:50 p.m. when Mayor Holloway, also a stated opponent of Lloyd’s emergency vaccine initiatives as not legally supportable by the Town, called the item to the floor. There was no public comment, at this point at least, as the matter was again presented as an emergency ordinance not requiring a public hearing – 10 speakers addressed this and related issues during the Public Comments beginning at about 8:53 p.m.

Above, Mayor Holloway ran a tight ship Monday, commenting that there would be no repeat of the disorder of July 26 during the first meeting consideration of Lloyd’s anti-vax-mandate proposal. Below, is it possible that this trio at odds for the bulk of the evening, shared a lighter moment Monday night? So it would seem, as Lloyd, Gillespie and Cockrell share a smile.

After Council Clerk Tina Pressley read the staff summary of Lloyd’s newest version of his anti-vaccination mandate into the record, Thompson perhaps surprisingly made a motion to approve it, which was seconded by Gillespie. Thompson and Gillespie were then joined by Cockrell in defeating the motion by a 3-0 “no” vote, with Lloyd recusing himself based on his unresolved conflict of interest issues, and McFadden abstaining from the vote.

However, 10 minutes earlier both Lloyd and McFadden did vote after McFadden called a point of order on the mayor’s call for a 10-minute recess. McFadden cited rules requiring a council vote on calling of a recess. After Holloway obliged, Thompson made the motion for the recess, seconded by Gillespie. The motion then passed by a 3-2 vote, Lloyd and McFadden dissenting – I guess it was one of the majority that may have needed a bathroom break.

See all these arguments, discussions, bathroom break wars, and related public comments, as well as other business to be addressed in coming Royal Examiner stories in the Town video.

Included in that other business, council unanimously voted to return proposed amendments to downtown apartment zoning Chapter 175 that might open the potential of a 60-unit apartment project in the middle of the Historic Downtown Business District to the Planning Commission for further review. And by guess what, a 3-2 margin Lloyd and McFadden dissenting, council approved a code change requiring a majority council vote to bring an item to a meeting agenda. Council kept the number at two members’ support to bring an item to a work session agenda for discussion to determine its viability for legal council action at a meeting.

And in other initiatives, council unanimously voted to relax codes on Bed & Breakfast uses in town Residential Districts; and also unanimously voted to amend codes to create an “Environmental Sustainability Chapter”. Several Tree Steward members including current President Melody Hotek, commended the initiative and the Town’s recent hiring of a certified Arborist to run this reworked Town function.

Town Manager Hicks may have been buoyed at positive feedback from Tree Steward members the Town butted heads with a year ago over defoliation work at Happy Creek, as his Environmental Sustainability Code Chapter was unanimously approved, and endorsed by the public, with some operational tweaking suggestions offered.

Tree Steward member David Means, among those who had butted heads with town officials over the Happy Creek tree-cutting-down, rip-rap rock episode, singled out Town Manager Steven Hicks for his work to re-establish a Town structure to deal with environmental issues.

Share the News:

Local Government

At least two supervisors willing to revisit continuation of coyote bounty program in more open forum

Published

on

Seeing the continued awarding of $50 bounties for the random shooting of coyotes in Warren County following a November 10, 2020, work session presentation by County legal and animal control staff seeking an end to the practice as counterproductive to its intent of thinning coyote pack numbers, Royal Examiner recently sought information on the Board of Supervisors apparently unanimous decision to continue the bounty awards.

In early October this reporter emailed Board Chairman Cheryl Cullers with copies to the other four board members in case there was a divergent opinion on the matter that has not, to this reporter’s knowledge, been publicly discussed. The only initial reply was from the board chair: “… but there are those that don’t agree with that information,” Cullers replied of the information presented to the board on November 10, 2020, by Warren County Sheriff’s Office Animal Control Officer Laura Gomez and Assistant County Attorney Caitlin Jordan.

Typical Consent Agenda request for approval of a coyote bounty payment. This one was submitted and approved nine months after supervisors were told the program was, not only ineffective but counterproductive to the intent of thinning coyote pack numbers. Royal Examiner Photos by Roger Bianchini; Coyote Photo Public Domain

“That information” was addressed in Royal Examiner’s November 11, 2020, story “County headed to public hearings to end coyote bounty payments and expansion of loose dog prohibitions”. It included the following information: “The biggest issue with (coyote bounties) is we have documentation showing it’s not effective in any way. And removing the coyote bounty would not prevent people from still being able to protect their property and their livestock … And they’re showing in that letter that it has over a 150-year failure,” Animal Control Officer Gomez noted of the proposed ordinance amendment ending the bounty program.



“That letter” referenced by Gomez to the county supervisors on November 10, 2020, stated among other things that: “Coyote bounties have been tried throughout the United States for more than 150 years. There is not a single documented instance of a bounty

program temporarily or permanently reducing coyote populations or livestock depredation problems,” Michael L. Fies of VDGIF (Va. Department of Game and Inland Fisheries) wrote in response to a November 2016 inquiry by Bath County Animal Control officials included in Tuesday night’s agenda packet,” Royal Examiner reported at the time.

WCSO Animal Control Officer Laura Gomez told the supervisors on Nov. 10, 2020, that 150 years of data indicates bounties have not helped reduce coyote numbers anywhere, at any time; and in fact, have the opposite impact of increasing female coyote reproductive cycles.

And it was not simply the abandonment of bounties, but the implementation of what was called more “successful targeted control” programs in place of bounties, suggested at the state level that was brought to the supervisors late last year:

“Since coyote bounties are ineffective, our Department has consistently recommended against these programs in favor of targeted control efforts around farms with a history of coyote damage. This approach has been successfully used by USDA Wildlife Services to reduce livestock losses in other portions of the state,” VDGIF’s Fies wrote in the above-referenced 2016 letter to Bath County officials presented to Warren County’s elected officials by animal control and legal staffs in late 2020.

It might be noted that this reporter’s headline on the referenced story on that November 10, 2020, presentation on coyote bounty programs contained one glaring inaccuracy – “County headed to public hearings to end coyote bounty payments (and a related animal control issue on dogs running loose in the county). For no public hearing was there to be, nor to this reporter’s knowledge, any open work session or meeting discussion by the board of the information it was presented with by county staff on November 10, 2020, nor of any expressed citizen disagreement with that information.

Rather, on January 5, 2021, coyote bounties were presented for continuation as part of the Consent Agenda for matters considered “routine business” not requiring public discussion or scrutiny by the board prior to a vote of approval. And while other Consent Agenda items were pulled for discussion that evening, continuing the coyote bounty program was not one of them.

But that could be poised to change. Contacted about the approval process, first Board Chairman Cullers expressed a willingness to revisit the issue. “I would be glad to have a future discussion on this issue. I understand the side that feels it is not effective, but there are those that don’t agree with that information. Again I will be glad to readdress the issue,” Cullers replied to this reporter’s emailed inquiry about the initial approval process.

WC Board Chair Cheryl Cullers has expressed a willingness to revisit the bounty issue in a more public forum. But where do her colleagues, pictured below at the Nov. 10, 2020, work session discussion of the coyote bounty program, stand on the issue?

And “readdress” would seem a wise course for this board majority. Because that initial approval process, essentially done out of the public eye, other than the vote to continue it without a public hearing or public discussion other than one meeting public comment favoring continuation of the bounties that Cullers cited, seems to run contrary to the process of a board majority carried into office over a year and a half ago on campaign promises of ending political “business as usual” out of the public eye – a process cited as contributing to the EDA financial scandal the county is still recovering from.

In fact, we reached out a second time to North River Supervisor Delores Oates following her comment at the October 5 Board of Supervisors meeting to County Administrator Ed Daley regarding the effectiveness of air purification machines the County is pondering the purchase of for use in county government buildings. – “We want facts, not opinions,” Oates told Daley of a final decision on the air purification device purchase for Warren County Government buildings.

Supervisor Oates stands by her ‘facts, not opinions’ statement and added her willingness to revisit the coyote bounty issue. She pointed to other issues like COVID pandemic ramifications and the County’s IT security breach as distracting the board from further exploration of alternatives to the coyote bounty system.

And yes, facts, as they are available, would be valuable in ascertaining the effectiveness of the air purification machines in limiting the spread of contagious viral or other airborne illnesses. But why not the same standard of “facts, not opinions” in the decision to continue a coyote bounty program found locally, state-wide, and nationally to be counterproductive to its intent of thinning coyote packs anywhere over 150 years of experience?

And Oates too expressed a willingness to revisit the issue prior to publication.

“I would be happy to discuss. If memory serves me correctly, there were no alternatives offered to control the population of coyotes at that presentation. I believe we postponed a decision to learn more about what options were available to reduce the coyote population,” Oates responded to our email inquiry.

“I stand on my facts, not opinions statement,” she added, pointing to myriad other issues the County has faced in the past year: “On this topic, we didn’t revisit as I suspect many other issues have taken precedent. With COVID and the IT breach, the coyote topic didn’t seem urgent. I am not opposed to revisiting the alternatives to bounties in the near term,” Oates wrote Royal Examiner, adding, “Perhaps we needed to understand what targeted control meant. I will be honest it’s been almost a year since we heard the presentation. We wanted to understand what the cost was to farmers with a targeted control approach. I know there were lingering questions which is why we just didn’t eliminate the program.”

And with a perhaps building board consensus, it appears the county supervisors may be revisiting the coyote bounty issue, and exploring alternatives such as those referenced “targeted control efforts around farms with a history of coyote damage” that Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Michael L. Fies referenced in his 2016 letter on the subject to Bath County officials. As we told Supervisors Cullers and Oates during our discussion, it seems counterintuitive to continue to pay people in a bounty program cited by wildlife professionals as not only ineffective but achieving the opposite effect of often increasing coyote numbers, rather than reducing them.

And if there are citizens who disagree with those conclusions of wildlife professionals, it would be nice to publicly hear what facts, if any, those disagreements are based upon.

See the full November 10, 2020, presentation and discussion in the linked Warren County Work Session video Nov 10, 2020 Board of Supervisors Work Session – Warren County, VA (swagit.com):

Share the News:

Continue Reading

Local Government

County Planning Commission reviews Fire Department Capital Improvement Plan, also faces upsurge in permit activity

Published

on

The Warren County Planning Commission met on October 13 in a work session to review a Capital Improvement Plan submission for 2021-2025 for the County Fire and Emergency Services Department. Chief James Bonzano told the Commission that calls for service for 2020, the last complete year, increased by over 3%, continuing a trend that began in 2013. This increase impacts response times, budget costs, and equipment availability, he explained. Calls were split between Fire, at 14%, and EMS (Emergency Medical Service), at 86%. EMS vehicles are called out more than 4 times as often as fire apparatus, have longer runs, and as a result, wear out that much sooner.

The National Standards for fire department equipment govern when it should be placed on the reserve list or removed from service. According to Chief Bonzano, the current fleet has 18 units of its 65 that are over 15 years old, and two over 25 years. In Warren County, there is currently no capacity to place vehicles in reserve. The chief also identified facility improvements needed, live-fire training, and firefighter cancer prevention as priorities in the submission. The Chief oversees a nearly $6 million annual combined budget.

Several commissioners suggested ways to extend budgets by alternative financing or leasing. The Chief acknowledged he is looking into these mechanisms but cautioned that many of them assume a fleet that allows for residual values when turning in a vehicle at the end of the lease. Much of the current fleet is far past the age where it would have any residual value as used equipment. The Fire/EMS Department is also pressed for volunteers – not only operational but associates – helpers of all kinds, including fundraisers. The Fire and Rescue Services capital investment submission will now be fed into the County’s budget process.

Fire Chief James Bonzano II, left, and Fire Marshal Gerry Maiatico explain the Fire and Rescue Department’s Capital Improvement request to the County Planning Commission. The Department faces funding challenges as the workload grows.


 

The regular Planning Commission meeting followed immediately after the work session, and the commission considered two Conditional Use permits (CUP) requests.

Terra Site Constructors, LLC, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a contractor storage yard at 6986 Winchester Road in the North River Magisterial District. The property is zoned Industrial (I). Planning Director Joe Petty reviewed the recommendations for approval of the request for the commission members. There were no public comments on the proposal, so Commission Chairman Robert Myers closed the public hearing. The site will primarily be used for the temporary storage of heavy equipment. After a brief discussion, the commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the permit. The request will now go to the Board of Supervisors for approval.

Jake Johnson, representing Terra Site Constructors LLC, takes questions from the County Planning Commission. Terra Site Constructors seeks to locate a storage yard on Winchester Road.

 

Gordon Lee Birkhimer has requested a Conditional Use Permit for a short-term tourist rental for his property at 52 Forest View Drive, an Agriculturally zoned property in the Fork Magisterial District. Mr. Birkhimer is planning a sailboat trip around the world and expects to be absent for up to two years. He has engaged a professional management firm to oversee the rental activity, and a local citizen to do maintenance and upkeep.

When Chairman Jones opened the floor for public comment, Pamela Rhodes addressed the commissioners and outlined her opposition to the permit. As a 30-year resident of the neighborhood, she expressed the opinion that the applicant would have no control over what kind of people would be renting the property and as an absent property owner would not care. She was opposed to long or short-term rental for the property. In addition, one neighboring property owner, Phyllis Wright, had written to the planning department and opposed the permit being issued. Her concerns were for personal safety, fire danger, and the potential for crime.

Resident Pamela Rhodes explains her opposition to a short-term tourist rental in the Massanutten Farms Subdivision.

 

Once the Public hearing was closed, Vice Chairman Hugh Henry commented that the community’s experience with short-term tourist rentals has been very good – an asset in a neighborhood, particularly since strict rules govern the issuance of a permit. Tourist rentals must be well maintained or guests won’t rent them. A long-term renter is a much greater risk, since a property owner can rent his property to anyone he chooses, and neighbors have no recourse. Management companies do generally perform background checks, and a written set of guidelines in the property management plan assure that guests know what the rules are.

Given the growing experience with the issuance of short-term tourist rental CUPs and the concerns of neighbors, Vice Chairman Henry asked the applicant if he would agree to two additional conditions: A prohibition against the use of ATVs on the property or roads around it, and a prohibition on discharging firearms. The applicant agreed. The commission then voted unanimously to recommend approval. The request will now go to the Board of Supervisors for approval.

The commission faces a steep climb at its November meeting with 10 CUP requests for a variety of uses, including short-term tourist rentals, a cluster housing development, an Outdoor Recreation Operation, two Rural Events Facilities, a gunsmithing service, and a campground, as well as two proposed Text Amendment changes to the Warren County Code Chapter 180. Commissioners approved authorizations to advertise all these requests.

Planning Director Joe Petty told the commission that the Comprehensive Plan review work sessions will resume in January, and he thanked the commissioners for their time and work so far on the new plan. Meantime, the Planning Department will be meeting with the contracting firm that is helping with the rewrite to prepare for the next steps.

Chairman Myers then adjourned the meeting.

Share the News:

Continue Reading

Local Government

County seeks Town to jointly explore regional water alliance

Published

on

While the Front Royal Town Council was failing to gather a quorum to conduct its work session slated to follow a 6 p.m. Finance and Audit Committee meeting at Town Hall, across town at the Warren County Government Center several town officials including Assistant Town Manager Kathleen Leidich and Public Works Director Robbie Boyer, were present to hear a presentation by the Frederick Water Authority to a work session of the Warren County Board of Supervisors.

Board Chair Cheryl Cullers noted the invitation extended to, not only town staff, but its elected officials at last month’s Liaison Committee meeting, to hear the presentation on what appears to be a state-and-federal government promoted move toward regional water authorities.

“I’m not trying to tell the Town what to do – I want them to be a part of this,” Cullers said of a cooperative move into an altered water-sewer utility relationship that could be of mutual benefit to both municipalities, particularly over the long haul of future development on the county’s north side.

Warren County Board Chair Cheryl Cullers made it clear she hopes the County and Town move forward together to explore participation in a regional water authority. Royal Examiner Photos by Roger Bianchini


Cullers noted that several council members have stated the intention of watching the County video of the presentation in playing catch up. And what town officials did or will hear is very interesting as to long-range planning for regional growth and provision of cost-efficient water and sewer service. For while the Town of Front Royal has its own central water-sewer utility, it is dealing with what was termed “100-year-old infrastructure” in some areas and a limited and now oft-threatened by solid waste-fueled destructive algae blooms, water supply, the Shenandoah River. The Frederick Water Authority on the other hand is in the midst of creating new infrastructure for what appears to be a massive underground water source, while entertaining a change in its structural documentation to extend its reach beyond the boundaries of Frederick County and the City of Winchester to adjacent counties including Warren and Clarke.

Frederick Water Authority Executive Director Eric Lawrence told county officials that the Frederick County Board of Directors was positive in reception of exploring the idea of expanding the water authority into a regional operation across county lines. As illustrated in power point below, Lawrence noted the Frederick Water Authority’s access to 4 billion gallons of water, enough reserve for a year of use by its current customer base.

Executive Director Eric Lawrence outlined the Frederick Water Authority’s existing parameters, structure and infrastructure. That structure includes independence from the Frederick County government, though it is a relationship that currently includes the Frederick County Supervisors appointing the water authority’s board of directors. Lawrence noted that like municipal utilities, the Frederick Water Authority is a non-profit operation with its fees going back into the supporting infrastructure. A cost-comparison showed favorable numbers on average residential charges in the region. And Lawrence noted that potential expansion into adjacent counties, further expanding the customer base would poise the operation to continue to offer excellent rates with a massive water supply with redundancy and backup within that water supply base.

Warren County, along with Clarke County, has expressed interest in a regional water authority based out of the existing Frederick Water Authority. And thus far Frederick County’s response has been positive, Lawrence told the Warren supervisors. Below, long-tenured Happy Creek Supervisor Tony Carter, maroon shirt upper right, pointed to aspects of the Rt. 522/340 North Corridor Agreement that might prevent Warren’s participation in a regional water utility authority without the agreement of the town government.

However, Happy Creek Supervisor Tony Carter pointed to an old written aspect of the Route 522 North Corridor Agreement that saw the Town of Front Royal extend its central water-sewer utility into Warren County’s Route 340/522 North Corridor to facilitate industrial and commercial tax-base expansion in the county’s northside. That “Sanitation Authority” aspect of the Corridor Agreement could seem to legally prohibit shopping for better water-sewer utility rates by Warren County on its northside. However, were the Town to agree to throw into the regional water concept with Warren County, seeing benefits to its own future operations and expenses, such a legal blockage could evaporate.

North River Supervisor Delores Oates noted recent experience had shown that working at odds with each other was in neither the County, nor Town’s best interest.

“I’m just saying that it’s easier to say than to do,” Carter said of a joint move of the Town and County governments toward a regional water authority that could create a major realignment of how the Town’s water-sewer utility operates.

North River Supervisor Delores Oates said a joint County-Town exploration of participating in an expanded, regional Frederick Water Authority seemed a logical path forward. Below, Carter said he was just noting that sometimes talking municipal cooperation was easier than achieving it.

See details of the Frederick Water Authority operations and future potential in an expanding regional format, along with its implications on utility costs on both sides of the town-county line, in the first hour-and-six-minute power point presentation and Q&A in the County work session video.

A cost comparison of current residential utility rates in the region.

Following that regional water authority presentation and discussion the board adjourned to Closed/Executive Session to discuss EDA litigation and related matters including recovery of EDA assets. And on the back end of that hour-and-fifteen-minute Closed Session, see a detailed presentation on the operations, costs and revenue streams of the County’s Parks and Recreation Department; followed by County Administrator Ed Daley’s summary of options on Compensation Board Bonus pay related to COVID pandemic operations and County payments to non-Comp Board covered employees.

Share the News:


Continue Reading

EDA in Focus

EDA completes audits for 2018 and 2019; 2020 audit is next

Published

on

The Board of Directors of the Front Royal and Warren County Economic Development Authority accepted its audited financial statements for fiscal years 2018 and 2019, today, October 5, 2021. The audit of the financial statements was conducted by the firm of Brown Edwards, CPAs of Harrisonburg, VA.

“We have received the final outside audits conducted for 2018 and 2019,” said EDA Board Chairman Jeff Browne.  “This was a huge effort on the part of Brown Edwards, and they have done very good work in challenging circumstances. Getting these two financial audits completed is a major step forward in putting the EDA’s past difficulties behind us. Now we can better focus on economic development issues to benefit the community.”

“The auditors’ letter points to three areas for improvement of internal controls,” Browne said. “It was important to make each improvement recommended by the CPAs, and we have done just that. The Warren County staff now administer the check-writing duties, collection of rents, and have layers of approvals for expenses within EDA and the County administration that were not there three years ago.”

The audited financial statements show that, at the end of the fiscal year 2019, the EDA’s total net assets were $38,036,737, and its net liabilities were $44,575,435, resulting in a deficit net position of $6,538,698. The EDA will work with Warren County’s auditors starting with the fiscal year 2020, which audit can now be undertaken.


Final Financial Statement 10-5-21

Final Letter to governance

 The EDA Board of Directors will have their next regular monthly board meeting via Zoom on Friday, October 29, 2021, at 9 a.m.

Share the News:

Continue Reading

Local Government

Outside agency, departmental updates dominate County Board’s attention

Published

on

The Warren County Board of Supervisors had a light action agenda – a six-item Consent Agenda – but a full morning of outside and County agency operational and personnel updates before adjourning to a 10 a.m. Closed Session for information on Economic Development Authority litigation. Following that approximate half-hour Executive Session, the board got the bad news from County Fire Marshal Gerry Maiatico that the County was not a recipient of SAFER grant funding recently announced through the State.

Maiatico explained that perhaps already being the recipient of grant funding for the Rivermont Fire Station, being near the front of the line for additional grant funding might be a longshot at this point. However, he added that there appeared to be funds remaining under the recent SAFER grant umbrella, so the department hasn’t given up hope some additional funding might come the County’s way for coming operational needs or equipment needs.

Fire Marshal Gerry Maiatico says County Emergency Services hasn’t given up hope some SAFER grant funding might not still find its way the County’s way. Below, Schools Superintendent Chris Ballenger outlined thus-far successful efforts to minimize pandemic exposure through the school system. Royal Examiner Photos by Roger Bianchini

Prior to the Closed Session County Public Schools Superintendent Dr. Chris Ballenger gave a detailed update on the school system’s status into this 2021 semester in the second year of COVID-19 Coronavirus pandemic precautions. The report was positive, with no system schools on the state “outbreak” list. Responding to a question, Ballenger explained that approximately 40 students on a quarantine list were a result of home exposures, and precautions to prevent those out-of-school exposures from being carried into the schools. Families were urged to do due diligence on potential home exposures, to help the system “Protect Instruction” as the semester progresses. The primary goal being to keep as many students as possible in school and safe from Coronavirus exposure, along with their instructors.


The system, like others, is dealing with a shortage of substitute or replacement instructors due to the evolving Coronavirus situation with the more contagious Delta-variant-fueled Phase 4 remaining an issue.

A presentation by People Inc. representatives tied into a follow up by Warren County Department of Social Services Director Jon Martz. Martz pointed out he had me with People Inc. reps the previous days to coordinate efforts moving forward as economic hardships are exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

With Marshall Williams at the podium, People Inc.’s Samantha Barber explains efforts to help with living situations for those struggling economically in the region, including those trying to successfully rehabilitate after their release from jail. Below, WCDSS Director Jon Martz introduces new DSS Job Developer Brooke McClung.

Martz made one of several new staff introductions to the board, from his department Job Developer Brooke McClung. However, he also noted the loss of DSS staffer Samantha Edwards to another jurisdiction closer to her home. Edwards is leaving her county position tomorrow to become the DSS Assistant Director in Rappahannock County.

Others staffers headed this way introduced to the board Tuesday morning included Human Resources Director Jane Meadows and Finance Director Matt Robertson. Kayla Darr was noted for her work filling gaps in Admin during this time of staffing transitions.

County Administrator Ed Daley, left, reminds town officials they are invited to next Tuesday’s 6 p.m. Board Work Session for a regional water presentation by Frederick County officials.

During his County Administrator’s Report, Ed Daley reminded town officials of next week’s 6 p.m., Tuesday, October 12, work session in which the County will receive a Regional Water initiative presentation by Frederick County officials. Town Council and key staff have been invited to consider potential advantages of both municipalities moving in a regional water provider direction.

See these discussions and other business, including the monthly VDOT update, and a work session presentation on operations and staffing at the County Public Works Department, in the County video.

Share the News:



Continue Reading

Local Government

County applies for broadband grant – seeking input from unserved locations

Published

on

Warren County has applied for a state grant to achieve universal fiber-to-the-home broadband to unserved locations in the County.

These state grants will only be available to areas that are unserved by broadband. As part of the planning effort, a list of unserved areas was submitted to the state agency that determines whether broadband service is available.

Click here to take the survey.

Several providers, including Virginia Broadband, Shentel, and Century Link/Lumen, have challenged the list of unserved areas in Warren County by claiming they already offer broadband service within areas proposed for grant funding.



A survey is available now to verify these unserved areas in Warren County.  Without adequate survey responses from these areas, they may be excluded from the broadband grant project.

 

Share the News:

Continue Reading

King Cartoons

Front Royal
52°
Sunny
7:25am6:29pm EDT
Feels like: 48°F
Wind: 8mph WSW
Humidity: 65%
Pressure: 30.06"Hg
UV index: 1
TueWedThu
72/48°F
73/46°F
75/54°F

Upcoming Events

Oct
18
Mon
11:00 am Art Class for K-1st @ Strokes of Creativity
Art Class for K-1st @ Strokes of Creativity
Oct 18 @ 11:00 am – 12:00 pm
Art Class for K-1st @ Strokes of Creativity
This class is for Kindergarten and First Grade. Perfect for home schoolers. Recommended ages: Ages 5 and 6 Tickets: CLICK HERE Tickets are available through Square Up, or can be paid in person at Strokes[...]
1:00 pm Art Class for 2nd & 3rd @ Strokes of Creativity
Art Class for 2nd & 3rd @ Strokes of Creativity
Oct 18 @ 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm
Art Class for 2nd & 3rd @ Strokes of Creativity
This class is for Grades 2nd and 3rd. Perfect for home schoolers. Recommended ages: 7 and 8 years old Tickets: CLICK HERE Tickets are available through Square Up, or can be paid in person at[...]
Oct
21
Thu
10:00 am Senior Painting Class with Dottie @ Strokes of Creativity
Senior Painting Class with Dottie @ Strokes of Creativity
Oct 21 @ 10:00 am – 12:00 pm
Senior Painting Class with Dottie @ Strokes of Creativity
Senior Painting Class with Dottie at Strokes of Creativity. Tickets: CLICK HERE Cost: $80 for 6 weeks Dates: Thursdays – Oct 21, Oct 28, Nov 4, Nov 11, Nov 18, Dec 4 Time: 10 am[...]
1:00 pm Art Class for 4th & 5th @ Strokes of Creativity
Art Class for 4th & 5th @ Strokes of Creativity
Oct 21 @ 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm
Art Class for 4th & 5th @ Strokes of Creativity
This class is for Grades 4th and 5th. Perfect for home schoolers. Recommended ages: 9 and 10 years old Tickets: CLICK HERE Tickets are available through Square Up, or can be paid in person at[...]
Oct
23
Sat
11:00 am Fall Farm Days: History of Sky M... @ Sky Meadows State Park
Fall Farm Days: History of Sky M... @ Sky Meadows State Park
Oct 23 @ 11:00 am – 5:00 pm
Fall Farm Days: History of Sky Meadows @ Sky Meadows State Park
Historic Area.  During Fall Farm Days History Weekend, step back in time and see history come to life. Stroll through the Historic Area buildings, interact with our living historians and discover our links to historic[...]
1:00 pm Paint Class for Kids Ages 8 and up @ Strokes of Creativity
Paint Class for Kids Ages 8 and up @ Strokes of Creativity
Oct 23 @ 1:00 pm – 2:30 pm
Paint Class for Kids Ages 8 and up @ Strokes of Creativity
This is a painting class for children 8 years old and up. Tickets: CLICK HERE Tickets are available through Square Up, or can be paid in person at Strokes of Creativity. Date: Saturday, October 23,[...]
Oct
24
Sun
11:00 am Fall Farm Days: History of Sky M... @ Sky Meadows State Park
Fall Farm Days: History of Sky M... @ Sky Meadows State Park
Oct 24 @ 11:00 am – 5:00 pm
Fall Farm Days: History of Sky Meadows @ Sky Meadows State Park
Historic Area.  During Fall Farm Days History Weekend, step back in time and see history come to life. Stroll through the Historic Area buildings, interact with our living historians and discover our links to historic[...]
Oct
25
Mon
11:00 am Art Class for K-1st @ Strokes of Creativity
Art Class for K-1st @ Strokes of Creativity
Oct 25 @ 11:00 am – 12:00 pm
Art Class for K-1st @ Strokes of Creativity
This class is for Kindergarten and First Grade. Perfect for home schoolers. Recommended ages: Ages 5 and 6 Tickets: CLICK HERE Tickets are available through Square Up, or can be paid in person at Strokes[...]
1:00 pm Art Class for 2nd & 3rd @ Strokes of Creativity
Art Class for 2nd & 3rd @ Strokes of Creativity
Oct 25 @ 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm
Art Class for 2nd & 3rd @ Strokes of Creativity
This class is for Grades 2nd and 3rd. Perfect for home schoolers. Recommended ages: 7 and 8 years old Tickets: CLICK HERE Tickets are available through Square Up, or can be paid in person at[...]
Oct
28
Thu
10:00 am Senior Painting Class with Dottie @ Strokes of Creativity
Senior Painting Class with Dottie @ Strokes of Creativity
Oct 28 @ 10:00 am – 12:00 pm
Senior Painting Class with Dottie @ Strokes of Creativity
Senior Painting Class with Dottie at Strokes of Creativity. Tickets: CLICK HERE Cost: $80 for 6 weeks Dates: Thursdays – Oct 21, Oct 28, Nov 4, Nov 11, Nov 18, Dec 4 Time: 10 am[...]