Connect with us

EDA in Focus

Tewalt raises specter of EDA ‘lies’ – Tederick calls for EDA closed session

Published

on

Jennifer McDonald faces council in October 2016 as she sought town code exemptions to cheapen the cost of Workforce Housing Project development – only one councilperson opposed the exemptions, Bébhinn Egger, questioning McDonald here. Royal Examiner File Photos/Roger Bianchini

As noted in our lead story on the Front Royal Town Council Work Session of June 3, Councilman Eugene Tewalt raised the issue of code and permitting exceptions council granted to the EDA at the request of former Executive Director Jennifer McDonald in November 2016. Tewalt said he would like those permitting exceptions rescinded because the Town was lied to about who the actual developer of the property would be.

Tederick takes the helm as interim mayor of Front Royal

“We were told lies – it was done bogusly and it was never intended to be built by the EDA, it was to be built by a private contractor. We were lied to on numerous occasions and I’d like to see it brought forward to a work session to discuss it so we can rescind the special use permit to whoever it goes to at this point,” Tewalt told his colleagues.

“I think that’ll be a good discussion for a lot of us,” Interim Mayor Matt Tederick commented.

The code exceptions granted the EDA in 2016 included waivers on the allowable length of a dead-end road into developed properties and a dropping of a code requirement that a dead-end road servicing a certain number of car trips per day be extended to a second outlet point so that it is no longer a one entry/exit point road as additional development is sought.

The view down Royal Lane from the still undeveloped Workforce Housing parcel – single-family homes to right, apartments to left and commercial properties at both ends of road

Public safety was the major concern of Royal Lane residents who spoke against the exemptions in 2016.

“My concern is for the safety of those who are there now. Is there a demand for this type of housing or is it just to line someone’s pockets?” Royal Lane resident Charles Jackson asked council in late 2016 when it was considering the code exceptions McDonald requested to cheapen developmental costs, ostensibly for the EDA.

However, only one councilperson, Bébhinn Egger, voted against the exemptions. Egger said she thought her five colleagues were “putting the cart before the horse” in facilitating development of 36 additional residential units before requiring road improvements that even those supporting the request admitted would eventually be needed.

At the time there were 99 exiting residential units along Royal Lane, nine single family homes and 90 apartments. There are also three commercial buildings, including a daycare center and medical building along Royal Lane.

When McDonald requested those permitting exceptions in late 2016 council was told the EDA would be the initial developer and apartment manager. However it was later disclosed that regional developer the Aikens Group was a secret private sector developer involved from the project’s outset in late 2014.

The still-undeveloped property was controversially sold by the EDA to a believed Aikens Group associate entity, Cornerstone LLC, on November 28, 2018. The sale price for the initially gifted 3.5-acre parcel at the end of Royal Lane that the EDA ended up paying $445,000, or $560,000 according to the EDA civil litigation, was inexplicably $10 (ten dollars American). The “Workforce Housing – Royal Lane Property Embezzlements” are listed as a $651,700 loss to the EDA in the March 26 civil action filed to recover a minimum total of $17.6 million in EDA assets.

Meow – hiss, HISSSS

The EDA cat out of the bag, the interim mayor suggested putting the EDA legal situation and its impact on the Town on an upcoming meeting agenda as an Executive (Closed) Session matter of legal consultation with the town attorney.

“I really would like to see us give staff a bit of direction on what we’re going to do with the Afton Inn property. We need to figure out what the plan is for that … It’s just not acceptable – we’ve been left holding the bag because of bad decisions from a person or people as it relates to the EDA scandal, and it’s just not acceptable,” Mayor Tederick told his colleagues.

The Afton Inn redevelopment work on hold due to EDA legal issues, the now 151-year-old building circa 1868, is one again languishing across the street from Town Hall to the right.

“So the Afton Inn issue is one issue I want to discuss. And I want to have a clear understanding of what’s taking place with Town Hall – I still call it Town Hall,” Tederick noted of his initial verbal reference to the former town hall and former fire station building on North Royal Avenue. “The former town hall is deteriorating before our very eyes.”

Tederick was a vocal opponent of the Afton Inn-old Town Hall swap, appearing before council to aggressively argue against the move in 2014. However, it was a move favored by a majority of downtown business people who sought a way to bring movement to either Afton Inn demolition or redevelopment.

The old Town Hall building was traded by council to Northern Virginia developer Frank Barros for his languishing Afton Inn property in 2014.

The former fire house and town hall building is for sale, tho word is the price is ‘too high’ to pique Town interest on a first right to match were an offer to be made on it.

Barros had been openly hostile to Town or EDA overtures on the property at the head of Front Royal’s Historic Downtown Business District after council sued its own Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) over an exemption it granted Barros to perform renovations that would have made the Afton building slightly taller than the Warren County Courthouse across the street.

By town code dating to who knows when, no building downtown is allowed to be taller than the courthouse. Following that circa-2006 council’s overturning of the BZA code waiver Barros seemed perfectly willing to let the now 151-year-old Afton Inn crumble to the ground in front of everyone’s eyes.

But now in Barros’s hands, the old Town Hall, circa 1930’s, is sitting vacant if not exactly crumbling with a “For Sale” sign in front. The council has recently discussed whether to renew a first option to match what is currently believed to be a too-high sale price on the old town hall.

Share the News:

EDA in Focus

Tederick discusses status of EDA, Crooked Run 2 water request & his brief tenure as interim mayor in this Royal Examiner video interview

Published

on

Interim Mayor Matt Tederick discusses his plans for the future with Roger Bianchini. Photo and video by Mark Williams, Royal Examiner.

Front Royal’s Interim Mayor Matt Tederick sat down with the Royal Examiner and yours truly on Thursday, August 15. Over nearly an hour Tederick discusses his decision to accept the May 28 appointment as mayor in the wake of Hollis Tharpe’s May 2 resignation; as well as his decision not to run in the November Special Election to serve out the final year of Tharpe’s term; as well as two prominent issues – the EDA and Crooked Run 2 central water request – facing council over the final three months of his tenure as mayor.

Included in the EDA discussion is the revelation Tederick plans to seek appointment of a citizens’ committee to review the report of the Town-County governmental personnel-staffed EDA Reform Committee announced at Tuesday’s joint meeting of the Town Council and Warren County Board of Supervisors.

Regaining public trust will be crucial to successfully moving forward with a re-tooled EDA mission, Tederick told Royal Examiner. The interim mayor hopes a citizens’ review committee can help achieve that trust.

Tederick also discusses the status of the County’s request for Town central water to facilitate the revamped Crooked Run 2 plan to establish a primarily residential development outside the town limits just west of the Crooked Run Shopping Center near the Route 340/522 and I-66 intersection.

Tederick also responds to our suggestion that the status of the planned Front Royal Limited Partnership (FRLP) residential development of approximately one thousand homes on about 750 acres of town land be included in discussion of the Crooked Run 2 request.

And if you hang to the interview’s conclusion you will hear the interim mayor promise other potential “exclusive” revelations regarding planned residential development in the community in future Royal Examiner interviews during his term of office.

It is a term slated to end shortly after the November 5 Special Election in which Tharpe will try to regain his mayoral seat in a two candidate face-off with current Councilman and former Mayor Eugene Tewalt.

Share the News:
Continue Reading

EDA in Focus

Good Bye, Warren County; Good Bye EDA controversy – Whitten moves on

Published

on

Dan Whitten, right, and County Administrator Doug Stanley on the job at a county supervisors meeting – Royal Examiner File Photo/Roger Bianchini

A hint was dropped at Tuesday night’s joint Town-County meeting on the EDA about County and EDA Attorney Dan Whitten’s pending availability to serve as a member of the newly-formed EDA Reform Committee. That hint came from Shenandoah District Supervisor Tom Sayre’s comment that Whitten wouldn’t be serving on the seven-member committee despite his inclusion and approval as the county attorney.

Reached for comment on Sayre’s allusion to his unavailability, Whitten confirmed that he had taken a job as County Attorney for Prince George County, Virginia. He said a press release would be forthcoming Wednesday morning, adding that the only ones who knew of his acceptance of the Prince George County job were his bosses, the county supervisors. This reporter agreed to sit on the news overnight as a negotiating tool for a follow-up interview.

While that negotiation is still being hashed out – you sure, no camera, Dan – we can now verify Whitten’s pending move to the county attorney’s role in Prince George County. Reached by phone Wednesday morning Whitten confirmed he will realize a $13,486 salary increase with the move. He is taking his new job at a salary of $117,300, compared to the $103,486 he makes here.

According to the press release Whitten’s last day on the job in Warren County will be September 13, 2019; he will begin his new job in Prince George County three days later on September 16.

With the move Whitten leaves behind the EDA financial scandal that has immersed him as both County and EDA Attorney since the March 26 filing of the EDA civil suit naming nine human and corporate “people” defendants seeking the return of as much as $20 million in allegedly misdirected or embezzled EDA assets.

To varying degrees the media, public and social media have questioned whether “scope limitations” imposed by county and EDA officials described by the contracted investigative public accounting firm Cherry Bekaert might indicate an investigation that was “channeled” toward certain financial irregularities and away from others.

An indicator of the public mood surrounding, not only the EDA civil and criminal actions, but his role as attorney for the primary governmental and quasi-governmental involved entities was illustrated by a question from Town Councilman Chris Holloway and the public reaction to it at last night’s joint Town-County meeting.

“Who do you represent tonight, the EDA or Warren County?” Holloway asked, creating the only public outburst of the meeting as a low murmur of approval of the question and applause ensued.

To left, Whitten and Stanley prepare for Tuesday evening’s joint Supervisors-Town Council meeting on the EDA’s future. At right Town Attorney Doug Napier and Town Manager Joe Waltz do the same. Royal Examiner Photos/Roger Bianchini

Whitten’s answer of “both” explaining no direct conflict of interest in answering questions about various legal dynamics of the EDA and County situations drew no public reaction.

In the press release received by the media at 11:06 a.m., Wednesday morning, August 14, Whitten expresses gratitude for his professional and personal experience in Warren County:
“Since starting my employment with Warren County on February 16, 2010, I have thoroughly enjoyed working for Warren County. I would like to thank the Board of Supervisors for offering me the opportunity to serve as the Warren County Attorney for the past three years. I will treasure the friendships that I have made with numerous Warren County employees and officials over the last nine years,” he stated in the release.

From left, Supervisors Tom Sayre and Archie Fox put their heads together as Linda Glavis whispers to Board Chair Dan Murray prior to last night’s joint meeting. Murray had kind words for Whitten’s grace under fire on the job in Warren County.

County Board of Supervisors Chairman Dan Murray added, “I am sorry to lose Dan as his knowledge and experience will be hard to replace. I appreciate how he has handled many contentious situations with grace, patience and respect. I consider him to be a friend and he will be sorely missed. He has been an asset to the County and the agencies he supports.”

Whitten did an internship at the State Attorney General’s Office while in law school. He also interned in Richmond immediately after his 2009 graduation from William and Mary Law School. Whitten received his Undergraduate Degree with a major in American Politics from the University of Virginia. He arrived as assistant county attorney to Blair Mitchell here in 2010 and took over as Warren County Attorney in September 2016 upon Mitchell’s retirement.

Share the News:
Continue Reading

EDA in Focus

Town, County undertake substantive discussion on future path of the EDA

Published

on

It’s almost a round table discussion – and on Aug. 27 with the EDA included it might be. Royal Examiner Photos/Roger Bianchini. Video by Mark Williams, Royal Examiner.

At 6 p.m. on Tuesday evening, August 13, the full Front Royal Town Council and Warren County Board of Supervisors and their staffs sat down face to face to discuss the future of the Town-County Economic Development Authority. The full joint meeting discussion was prompted by Interim Mayor Matt Tederick’s July 18 Town-County Liaison Committee meeting comment about the possible unilateral dismantling of the EDA.

Such a thought was prompted by an initial separation in information sharing regarding the EDA financial fraud investigation and consequent legal action the County has unilaterally footed the bill for to the tune of approximately $1.35 million. Of course the County voluntarily took on full operational funding of the EDA several years ago as part of its long and ongoing compensation to the Town for its North Corridor central water-sewer service extended into the county without annexation.

However, given the floor by Joint Meeting Chairman and County Board Chair Dan Murray, Tederick made it clear his agenda was achieving unified Town-County action to try and get to a shared bottom line on exactly how much of each municipality’s money was misdirected, to where and if it is recoverable.

The meeting began with County Board Chair Dan Murray’s now familiar pre-meeting call of prayer for community healing.

Consequently much of the ensuing discussion surrounded legal ramification of joint action in the face of the Town’s now-$15 million suit against the EDA seeking recovery of lost Town assets and the concurrent EDA civil suit seeking recovery of around $20 million in allegedly misdirected EDA assets from eight human and corporate entities. As noted above, due to its larger annual budget Contingency Fund the County has fronted all of the thus-far spent $1.35 million paid to contracted public investigative accounting firm Cherry Bekaert and the law firm Sands Anderson that is handling the EDA civil action stemming from the Cherry Bekaert report.

Five of the EDA’s 7-member board were present in the closest, front row seats pictured here.

An overview of the Villa Community Center meeting room from the back of the largest public seating section

Among a room full of interested spectators were five of the seven current EDA Board members and new EDA Executive Director Doug Parsons. By meeting’s end around 7:35 p.m., Parsons had been appointed by joint consensus to an EDA Reform Committee along with Councilman Jacob Meza, Fork District Supervisor Archie Fox, Town Manager Joe Waltz, County Administrator Doug Stanley, Town Attorney Doug Napier and County/EDA Attorney Dan Whitten.

See the discussion, votes, questions and answers as two municipal governments try to come to terms with the consequences – financial, economic, legal and political – of one of the deepest and most divisive scandals in this community’s modern history in the following Royal Examiner video:

Share the News:
Continue Reading

EDA in Focus

Mayor, Town Council seek EDA financial answers, not just future plans

Published

on

County Administrator Doug Stanley watches as Interim Town Mayor Matt Tederick makes his perceptions about the EDA’s future known at July 18 Town-County Liaison meeting. Royal Examiner File Photos/Roger Bianchini. Video by Mark Williams, Royal Examiner.

In a work session following the Front Royal Town Council meeting of Monday, August 12, the format and parameters of the joint meeting of the full council and Warren County Board of Supervisors regarding the future of the Town-County Economic Development Authority was a hot topic of conversation. That joint Town-County-EDA meeting is scheduled for tonight, August 13, at 6 p.m. at the Villa Avenue Community Center.

The proposed agenda send to Interim Mayor Matthew Tederick included a presentation from the County side with updates on the distribution of property along with a time frame update. However Mayor Tederick brought this to the council with hesitance, stating, “We need necessary and pertinent information, but is that the best use of this joint meeting?”

Councilman Jacob Meza agreed, stating, “I would rather be able to sit down with the board of supervisors and discuss the greatest disaster between the County and the Town than sit through a 45-minute presentation given to us by the EDA board.”

Councilman Eugene Tewalt appeared to hit a middle ground, saying, “I want to get information – and I want to ask them some pertinent questions.”

It seemed that council was willing to move forward with the meeting including an EDA presentation, so long as EDA officials and the county board complied with giving information that council wants.

Tederick propelled the joint meeting forward with his July 18 Town-County Liaison Committee meeting statement that the Town could dissolve the EDA unilaterally and take half the remaining assets. If palpable tension was apparent in the wake of that assertion, it might be explained by some events leading up to it. After having a series of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for details of the EDA fraud investigation rejected by EDA/County Attorney Dan Whitten, the Town filed a lawsuit initially seeking return of about $3 million in Town assets, a number since raised to an estimate of $15 million in recoverable assets the Town believes it is owed by the EDA.

County Board Chairman Dan Murray and Mayor Tederick eventually agreed it may take their full boards to reach common ground on the future of the EDA.

The issues with miscommunication between the EDA and Town Council became apparent when the next agenda item, financing of the new Front Royal Police Department headquarters, was reached. Due to confusion over what the EDA owes the Town, issues concerning the Town Budget cannot be resolved, town officials indicated.

“Who’s currently paying the debt service on this building – the EDA who has not provided the proper services and documentation to make those payments?” Tederick asked, adding, “We should not discuss any financing for the police department until we get documentation from the EDA.”

The Town’s elected officials and staff will seek some clarity on FRPD financing obligations, and the Town’s overall financial relationship with the EDA at tonight’s meeting.

See the work session discussion and Vice Mayor William Sealock’s response to Royal Examiner questions in the following videos.
(Roger Bianchini contributed to this story)


Share the News:
Continue Reading

Crime/Court

Sayre – McDonald defamation suit continued to September 11

Published

on

Happier times for this odd couple – Tom Sayre and Jennifer McDonald during the ITFederal ground breaking ceremony. Social Media Photo

Approaching 6 p.m. after nearly five hours of testimony in Warren County Supervisor Tom Sayre’s defamation of character civil suit against former EDA Executive Director Jennifer McDonald Friday afternoon, Winchester-based Judge Ian Williams continued the trial to September 11 at 1:15 p.m. Sayre attorney Tim Bosson said he anticipated his client testifying for a half hour to 45 minutes that day, with a similar time frame anticipated in cross examination by McDonald attorney Lee Berlik.

Berlik also told the court he may call his client to testify on her own behalf that day. If he so chooses it is likely to result in more testimony than McDonald offered when she was called shortly after 1 p.m. Friday as the first witness for the plaintiff. It seems that the first thing that occurred when McDonald walked out of the RSW Jail on bond after two months in jail on Wednesday was the serving of a witness subpoena on behalf of the plaintiff.

When she was called to testify by Sayre’s attorney, Berlik alerted the court that “any and all questions relating to the EDA” would be met by his client’s right to assert her Fifth Amendment right not to self incriminate.

McDonald and her two real estate LLC’s are named as three of nine human and LLC defendants in the EDA civil litigation seeking recovery of about $20 million in allegedly embezzled or misdirected EDA assets. She is also facing 14 felony criminal charges handed down by the special grand jury empanelled to investigate potential criminality related to the Cherry Bekaert EDA fraud investigation and consequent civil suit filed March 26.

McDonald wasted no time in asserting her Fifth Amendment right. At least five out of the eight questions asked of her were negated by McDonald’s plea of the Fifth. Judge Williams upheld McDonald’s Fifth Amendment responses.

Questions she did respond to included confirming her December 2018 resignation as EDA executive director; an assertion that an old personal assets statement was outdated; and verification that text and email messages dated between June 6 and July 14, 2017 were actual communications between her and Royal Examiner reporter Roger Bianchini. Those texts and emails were introduced as plaintiff’s Exhibits 3 and 4. They were exhibits that would significantly come into play during later testimony.

In asserting the plaintiff’s claim for $25,000 in damages for defamation of character Sayre attorney Tim Bosson called a series of witnesses to illustrate that McDonald had spread the idea of his client’s involvement in both the EDA office break in of May 18, 2017, and a series of trespass and vandalism incidents alleged to be occurring at her home property through May and June of that year.

To a great extent those witnesses and their testimony revolved around the content of a note found at the scene of the vandalism McDonald reported occurring around 9 p.m., Thursday, June 15. According to the Warren County Sheriff’s Office investigative report, McDonald pointed out a crumpled piece of paper in her yard she indicated was not there earlier in the day when she cleaned her yard.

The note mentions several names and instructions to conduct an effort to terrorize McDonald that appears to include the EDA office break in McDonald reported on May 18, 2017, and continuing through a series of events at her home property. The names “Tom” and “Matt” appear on the note, as well as “the Examiner” where “Norma Jean” was purported to have been waiting for files McDonald reported being stolen during the May 18 EDA office break in about a month before the purported home rock-throwing vandalism.

Two phone numbers of alleged participants in the conspiracy are also present at the bottom of the note. They turned out to be the business numbers of Sayre and former Town Manager Michael Graham.

As they did at McDonald’s 2018 Halloween Day false police report misdemeanor trial, Shaw and Graham both testified they knew nothing of the note or its alleged conspiracy, as Sayre is likely to on September 11. And while Warren County General District Judge W. Dale Houff dismissed the false police report case against McDonald last year, he did observe of the note that “something is made up and something is horribly wrong with this”.

There was also something apparently terribly wrong about a story Royal Examiner reporter Roger Bianchini testified McDonald told him several weeks later about identifying a suspect in the masonry stone vandalism of June 15, 2017. The Royal Examiner reporter said that in late June or early July 2017 McDonald said that while several security cameras on her property had been vandalized during earlier trespasses, one less obtrusive one near her front door had remained in tact.

That camera recorded a facial image of the suspect, whom her private investigator had eventually identified as a petty criminal type and former client of Tom Sayre’s law practice. One of McDonald’s emails to Bianchini, dated July 14, 2017 appeared to verify Bianchini’s testimony.

“He talked with PI and PI has asked him to wire himself and go talk to the culprit. we do not want a he said/she said situation,” McDonald emailed in response to Bianchini’s query, “Anything good to report” about the investigation into the vandalism.

“So he admitted to his own Russia collusion – who is his ‘Putin’ pulling the strings?!!? … and is it a lone wolf or multiple Putins,” Bianchini responded about the masterminds of alleged conspiracy against her.

“He did and multiple putins, but the first putin asked him to do it,” McDonald replies.

“Is the first Putin our photo boy?” Bianchini inquires.

“Yes sir,” McDonald replies ending the e-conversation of July 14, 2017.

On direct examination Bianchini explained the “photo boy” reference related to an earlier, June 11, 2017 text from McDonald: “May have a tip that an elected official is in cahoots with what is happening to me,” McDonald texted.

“Someone I have been trying to find photos of for you,” McDonald added in response to a request for an “off the record” clue as to an identity.

The only person Bianchini said he and McDonald had discussed acquiring a photo of from local newspaper archives dating to 1989-90 was Tom Sayre around the time he arrived in this area sporting what Bianchini described as a radically-different look.

Private Investigator Ken Pullen was asked about McDonald’s representations about a suspect requested to wear a wire on Sayre in discussion about the plot against McDonald. Pullen testified under direct examination by Sayre attorney Bosson that he had initially been hired by the EDA Board of Directors around June 6, 2017 to investigate the EDA office break in. Drescher testified that McDonald asked her board to ask that FRPD be taken off the case because she did not feel comfortable with the direction of their investigation, which appeared to be moving toward the three EDA staffers with access to a key to the office since there was no sign of forced or unforced entry.

Drescher has previously said that the private investigator-driven investigation was eventually turned over to McDonald and encompassed events alleged to be occurring at her home.

Asked about McDonald’s June 11 text to Bianchini that there was evidence “an elected official is in cahoots with what is happening to me” and “No one else knows what is happening this is from my PI,” Pullen stated he had no such evidence.

“You didn’t tell her that?” Bosson asked.

“No,” Pullen replied.

Asked about the alleged effort to have a suspect wear a wire on a co-conspirator Bianchini believed McDonald had identified as Sayre, Pullen said, “No I had not,” adding, “I had no suspect – I did not have anyone wired up.”

If Sayre’s counsel focused on evidence indicating the former EDA executive director had spread his client’s name into the community as a suspect in criminal behavior targeting her, McDonald attorney Lee Berlik took a “no harm, no foul” line with plaintiff witnesses. He argued that the presence of Sayre’s phone number and name on the mysterious note had not meaningfully impacted the Shenandoah District supervisor’s reputation.

Repeatedly he asked plaintiff witnesses what they thought Sayre’s reputation in the community was and had it been damaged by the talk of his phone number’s presence on the note found at the site of the June 15, 2017 vandalism.

A number of witnesses, including Sayre’s fellow Supervisor Archie Fox, former Town Manager Michael Graham whose number was also found on the note, and former Royal Examiner Editor Norma Jean Shaw said they thought Sayre’s reputation was a good one and not been terribly damaged by the talk of his involvement in a plot against McDonald.

Only Bianchini said he thought Sayre’s reputation varied widely depending on who in the community you talked to. But he also failed to say whether he believed that reputation had been damaged widely by the rumor of his participation in an alleged criminal targeting of McDonald.

Asked how many people he told about McDonald’s contention about Sayre’s number on the conspiracy note, Bianchini estimated five or less – his Royal Examiner associate Norma Jean Shaw and possibly Publisher Mike McCool, Michael Graham because of the (202) number, another local reporter using only the four 7’s as a clue, and a girlfriend to illustrate how crazy his job was getting.

Berlik made a point of noting to those others whose name or phone number was on the note that they had not filed a defamation suit over their being implicated in a fashion similar to Sayre’s.

Only Shaw, who along with “the Examiner” was cited as waiting for allegedly stolen material from the EDA office break in, replied that she had considered filing a defamation suit against
McDonald, but added, “I don’t think she has any more money and it would be a waste of time.”

And now there is a five-week wait for the dramatic conclusion of the first of dueling defamation lawsuits filed by Sayre and McDonald against each other – stay tuned for more developments …

Things continue to get interesting on the EDA and related fronts at the Warren County Courthouse. Royal Examiner File Photo/Roger Bianchini

Share the News:
Continue Reading

Crime/Court

Poe ‘bound & determined … to clear his name’ in EDA criminal, civil cases

Published

on

Donald Poe was returned to RSW Jail yesterday evening for his Wednesday bond hearing. While also still housed at RSW at 3 p.m., he too should soon be home and out of jail garb before long after being granted a $20,000 secured bond by Judge Bruce Albertson

During a brief five-minute recess following adjournment after Michelle Henry’s motions arguments were completed at 10:30 a.m. Wednesday morning, 23 relatives and friends of Donald F. Poe filled the defense table side of Warren County Courthouse Circuit Courtroom B public seating area, spilling a couple of stragglers to the other side.

Poe’s long personal, family and business connections to the community were a focal point of defense counsel William Ashwell’s bond arguments on his client’s behalf. Judge Bruce D. Albertson didn’t have to look far to see evidence of those connections out in force.

Ashwell called his client “a 60-year resident of Warren County” – Poe is 60 years old – with family ties to the area dating back to the 1700’s in the Fauquier and Warren County area.

Poe’s attorney cited his work with his client for the last several months on the EDA civil litigation side of the legal equation. Poe is one of nine defendants named in the EDA civil suit filed March 26, as is his business partner Justin Appleton and their Earth Right Energy LLC solar panel installation company. The ERE trio’s involvement in the civil action, and Poe’s three criminal indictments, all appear related to ERE contracted work for or through the EDA and McDonald. Evidence provided on the civil side indicate some of that work accomplished, some cancelled, with reimbursements discussed and/or achieved according to ERE counsel.

Ashwell noted Poe’s presence for hearings and testimony throughout the civil litigation process, including the Special Grand Jury interview process that resulted in the three indictments against him.

“Other than the EDA involvement and the media attention this would be a fairly normal bond hearing,” Ashwell told the court.

Poe is charged on two felony counts of obtaining money by false pretense and one count of perjury.

Ashwell told Judge Albertson that Poe’s participation in preparing his own defense while incarcerated at the Prince William-Manassas Jail “was functionally impossible”. And prepare a defense, rather than flee the scene, is what his client is committed to, Ashwell said with emphasis.

“He is bound and determined more than any other client I’ve had to clear his name on these charges and on the civil case,” Poe’s attorney told the court.

Ashwell noted that Poe’s past criminal record and incarceration dated back to 1989-90 and that his record has been clean since his conviction and time served on those offenses. While not elaborated on during the hearing those legal issues dating back three decades related to non-opioid drugs and/or drug distribution.

Commonwealth’s counsel Bryan Layton said that while the perjury charge against Poe, believed to relate to his EDA Special Grand Jury testimony, gave him some concern that overall he could not dispute defense counsel’s assertions about Poe’s appearances and cooperation in the civil litigation process.

Consequently Judge Albertson granted Poe secured bond of $20,000.

According to the RSW Jail website Poe was no longer an inmate as of 5:40 p.m. Wednesday afternoon.

Share the News:
Continue Reading

King Cartoons

Front Royal
71°
Clear
06:3319:58 EDT
Feels like: 71°F
Wind: 3mph S
Humidity: 90%
Pressure: 29.94"Hg
UV index: 0
ThuFriSat
92/67°F
74/56°F
77/56°F

Upcoming Events

Aug
22
Thu
5:30 pm Medicare Basics Educational Pres... @ Samuels Public Library | White Meeting Room B
Medicare Basics Educational Pres... @ Samuels Public Library | White Meeting Room B
Aug 22 @ 5:30 pm – 7:00 pm
Medicare Basics Educational Presentation @ Samuels Public Library | White Meeting Room B
Come learn the basics of Medicare including: Eligibility, Important Dates, Medicare Coverage, Medicare Parts A,B,C, and D and Supplement Options. No Cost No RSVP required Walk-ins welcome For Educational purposes only For accommodations of persons[...]
Aug
24
Sat
8:00 am Safe Driving Class for Seniors @ Front Royal Police Department
Safe Driving Class for Seniors @ Front Royal Police Department
Aug 24 @ 8:00 am – 5:00 pm
Safe Driving Class for Seniors @ Front Royal Police Department
Hosted By: Front Royal/Warren County S.A.L.T./TRIAD Are you a senior 50 and over in need of learning current driving trends, traffic laws and just an overall overview of driving safely? If so, AARP provides a[...]
10:00 am Sample an Irish Dance Class @ Jig 'n' Jive Dance Studio
Sample an Irish Dance Class @ Jig 'n' Jive Dance Studio
Aug 24 @ 10:00 am – 10:45 am
Sample an Irish Dance Class @ Jig 'n' Jive Dance Studio
Sample an Irish Dance Class at the Jig ‘n’ Jive Dance Studio. Saturday, August 24th. 10:00 – 10:45am. $2/dancer. Boys and Girls. No experience or registration required.
4:30 pm Front Royal Salvation Army Corps... @ Salvation Army
Front Royal Salvation Army Corps... @ Salvation Army
Aug 24 @ 4:30 pm – 8:30 pm
Front Royal Salvation Army Corps BBQ Cookout @ Salvation Army
The Front Royal Salvation Army Corps will host a BBQ Cookout on Saturday, August 24, 2019, from 4:30 pm to 8:30 pm at 296 South Street, Front Royal. A BBQ chicken meal, including chips and[...]
Aug
27
Tue
1:30 pm Botanicals in Watercolor I @ Art in the Valley
Botanicals in Watercolor I @ Art in the Valley
Aug 27 @ 1:30 pm – 4:00 pm
Botanicals in Watercolor I @ Art in the Valley
This four week course with the instructor, Elena Maza, will deal with the basic three-primary color palette, different pigments and how they interact, how to mix all colors from three primary colors, how to apply[...]
Aug
29
Thu
1:00 pm Substance Abuse and Recovery Summit @ Mountain Home Bed and Breakfast
Substance Abuse and Recovery Summit @ Mountain Home Bed and Breakfast
Aug 29 @ 1:00 pm – 3:00 pm
Substance Abuse and Recovery Summit @ Mountain Home Bed and Breakfast
The McShin Foundation and RSW (Rappahannock, Shenandoah, and Warren County) Regional Jail would like to invite you to our substance abuse and recovery summit to be held on August 29, 2019, in Front Royal, Virginia.[...]
Aug
31
Sat
1:00 pm DJ Skyhigh’s End of Summer Blast @ Warren County Fair
DJ Skyhigh’s End of Summer Blast @ Warren County Fair
Aug 31 @ 1:00 pm – 9:00 pm
DJ Skyhigh's End of Summer Blast @ Warren County Fair
Come join DJ Skyhigh for his end of summer blast. Lisa Bell will be hosting wine tastings (at an additional charge) of over 50 international wines. Wines may also be purchased by the bottle to[...]
Sep
3
Tue
1:30 pm Watercolor Landscapes @ Art in the Valley
Watercolor Landscapes @ Art in the Valley
Sep 3 @ 1:30 pm – 4:30 pm
Watercolor Landscapes @ Art in the Valley
This four week course with instructor Elena Maza will focus on learning basic skills to create watercolor landscape paintings: basic composition and use of color and value to create a sense of depth and distance.[...]
Sep
4
Wed
1:30 pm Botanical Drawing @ Art in the Valley
Botanical Drawing @ Art in the Valley
Sep 4 @ 1:30 pm – 4:30 pm
Botanical Drawing @ Art in the Valley
Learn and practice the art of botanical drawing in pencil with local artist and instructor Elena Maza. This four session course will focus on learning basic drawing skills as applied to botanicals: basic line drawings[...]
Sep
7
Sat
10:00 am SHS Marching Band Mattress Fundr... @ Skyline High School
SHS Marching Band Mattress Fundr... @ Skyline High School
Sep 7 @ 10:00 am – 5:00 pm
SHS Marching Band Mattress Fundraiser @ Skyline High School
Skyline High School Marching Band is having a mattress sale fundraiser on Saturday, September 7, 2019, from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. at Skyline High School (151 Skyline Vista Drive, Front Royal, Virginia). There will[...]