Drowning Prevention: A Universal Right or  A Privilege? 

Every year, around 4,500 people in the United States die from unintentional drowning, averaging 11 deaths per day. It is the leading cause of death for children ages 1–4 and the second for children ages 5–14. Despite these alarming statistics, many people view swimming as a recreational or luxury skill rather than a crucial survival tool. This misconception is fueled by historical, systemic, and economic barriers that have created and perpetuated disparities in water safety education. The danger of drowning is a global public health crisis that transcends geography, socioeconomic status, and race.

The idea that swim literacy is a niche concern, relevant only to some communities or those with easy access to pools, is a dangerous oversimplification.  Drowning can occur anywhere there is water, including bathtubs, residential pools, ponds, lakes, rivers, and even during flash floods. For most of the U.S., the risk of drowning is an ever-present danger.

The scope of this issue is far more extensive than fatal drownings alone. For every child who dies from drowning, another seven receive emergency care for related injuries that can cause long-term brain damage and other ongoing health issues. The total number of affected individuals—fatalities, non-fatal victims, and their families—reveals a public health crisis, not a specialized problem. Furthermore, drowning is a global issue, with over 90% of drowning deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries. This demonstrates that the problem is not isolated to specific, water-rich regions but is a worldwide threat to human safety.

In the U.S., deep-seated racial disparities demonstrate that the lack of swim literacy is not random. Historically, discriminatory practices, including the segregation of swimming pools and public beaches, prevented many Black and other minority communities from learning to swim. These systemic barriers have created intergenerational cycles of fear and inadequate training. If a parent does not know how to swim, there is a significantly lower chance that their child will learn. A USA Swimming Foundation study found that 64% of Black children and 45% of Latino children have few to no swimming skills, in contrast to 40% of white children. This is not a matter of individual choice but a legacy of exclusion and a lack of access to safe, affordable instruction.

Even today, disparities persist due to income inequality. The USA  Swimming Foundation found that 79% of children from families with a household income of less than $50,000 have no or low swimming ability. Many low-income families and immigrant communities view swimming lessons as a luxury they cannot afford. The data shows that drowning disproportionately affects marginalized and economically disadvantaged communities, who are least able to access life-saving water safety education.

The argument that swimming is a luxury falls apart when confronted with the reality of drowning statistics. Viewing swimming lessons as an optional recreational or sports activity overlooks their fundamental purpose as a survival skill. Learning basic water competency skills—such as floating, treading water, and reaching a safe exit—is an essential, life-saving investment. Like learning to look both ways before crossing the street, water safety is a foundational part of protecting oneself in a world where water is ubiquitous.

The benefits of swim literacy extend beyond pure survival, promoting lifelong health, confidence, and enjoyment. Yet, these positive aspects are inaccessible to the millions of people.  50% of the U.S. population does not know how to swim.

To reframe swim literacy as the public health necessity it is, it must be addressed through systemic interventions. This includes:

• Accessible and affordable lessons
• Inclusive public health campaigns
• Universal school programs

Drowning Prevention should be a universal right, rather than a privilege, is the only way to effectively combat the high and inequitable rate of drowning deaths that devastates families across the world.

2 For 2 Foundation
Winchester, VA

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the letters published on this page are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the Royal Examiner’s editorial team, its affiliates, or advertisers. The Royal Examiner does not endorse or take responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or validity of any statements made by the authors. The Royal Examiner has not independently verified the statements and claims presented in the letters. Readers are encouraged to exercise their judgment and critical thinking skills when evaluating the content. Any reliance on the information in the letters is at the reader’s own risk.

While the Royal Examiner makes every effort to publish diverse opinions, it does not guarantee the publication of all received letters. The Royal Examiner reserves the right to edit letters for clarity, length, and adherence to editorial guidelines. Moreover, the Royal Examiner does not assume any liability for any loss or damage incurred by readers due to the content of the letters or any subsequent actions based on these opinions.

In submitting a letter to the editor, authors grant the newspaper the right to publish, edit, reproduce, or distribute the content in print, online, or any other form.

We value our readers’ engagement and encourage open and constructive discussions on a wide range of topics. However, the Royal Examiner retains the right to reject any letter that contains offensive language, personal attacks, or violates any legal regulations. Thank you for being part of our vibrant community of readers and contributors.

We look forward to receiving your diverse perspectives on matters of interest and importance.